Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: IF'ing 18/6 or 14/10??

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    15

    IF'ing 18/6 or 14/10??

    I'm an active male and I've been having problems with a 18/6 type IF. I do feel better and perform better with a 14/10 type IF, but in that 10 hour window I eat right up to the point of going to sleep. I have seen mixed results which I might attribute to food choice and time of eating around work out (the longer the time from my last meal and my workout the better). Anyone have an opinion or suggestions? I eat strictly primal.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the desert
    Posts
    303
    I would simply move the last meal a couple hours earlier than where you have it, as long as you are hungry by that time.

  3. #3
    I don't understand how folks call 14-18 hours without food a fast. You're essentially skipping breakfast and shifting your meals to the evening. It's just trendy and rationalizing to call skipping breakfast 'intermittent fasting'. FWIW, I do a 24-30 hour fast (which means stopping eating at lunch or dinner one day and not breaking fast until dinner the next). It does involve skipping at least 2 meals, so that does seem more like a fast.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,478
    Quote Originally Posted by cassel_man View Post
    I don't understand how folks call 14-18 hours without food a fast. You're essentially skipping breakfast and shifting your meals to the evening. It's just trendy and rationalizing to call skipping breakfast 'intermittent fasting'. FWIW, I do a 24-30 hour fast (which means stopping eating at lunch or dinner one day and not breaking fast until dinner the next). It does involve skipping at least 2 meals, so that does seem more like a fast.
    So, basically you are calling everybody else wimps and reserving the title of "IFer" only for the hardcore cool guys like yourself? Pklopp had a whole series of posts with some studies showing the "sweet spot" for regular daily fasting being 12-18 hours.
    If you are new to the PB - please ignore ALL of this stuff, until you've read the book, or at least http://www.marksdailyapple.com/primal-blueprint-101/ and this (personal fave): http://www.archevore.com/get-started/

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by tfarny View Post
    So, basically you are calling everybody else wimps and reserving the title of "IFer" only for the hardcore cool guys like yourself? Pklopp had a whole series of posts with some studies showing the "sweet spot" for regular daily fasting being 12-18 hours.
    No, what I'm saying is, use definitions of words. If you do something on a daily basis as 18/6 folks do, it's not really intermittent. It's just regimented and restricted. What's the difference between skipping a meal and when does it become a fast? Technically any time between meals if fasting time. I fast most everyday for 4, 6 and 12 hours, I'm a fasting machine!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,354
    Quote Originally Posted by ebolus101 View Post
    I'm an active male and I've been having problems with a 18/6 type IF. I do feel better and perform better with a 14/10 type IF, but in that 10 hour window I eat right up to the point of going to sleep. I have seen mixed results which I might attribute to food choice and time of eating around work out (the longer the time from my last meal and my workout the better). Anyone have an opinion or suggestions? I eat strictly primal.
    Huh?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    394
    It's 16/8, not 18/6. See that error a lot. Do a 10 hour window if you want, but that's for girls.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Port Townsend, Washington
    Posts
    3,736
    Quote Originally Posted by RezH View Post
    Do a 10 hour window if you want, but that's for girls.
    Umm...not so much from what I've read on the Ladies' IF thread. 10 hours was simply what Martin at LeanGains noted was easier for some of the women he worked with.

    I regularly fast 16-18 hours with occasional 22 hour fasts. (Female, 48)

    Honestly, trial and error helped me find what worked best for me.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    661
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonfly View Post
    Umm...not so much from what I've read on the Ladies' IF thread. 10 hours was simply what Martin at LeanGains noted was easier for some of the women he worked with.

    I regularly fast 16-18 hours with occasional 22 hour fasts. (Female, 48)

    Honestly, trial and error helped me find what worked best for me.
    Me too! I regularly fast 16 hours. Lunch at noon, and I don't eat after 8PM. And I'm loosing weight.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    199
    I might have missed something, but why are you fasting? What is the goal that you are reaching for? You say your having problems with the 18/6 fast, what problems? Just that you eat to much? That's easy, only eat when you are truly hungry, I think the benefit of a fast is reduced caloric intake and also to give your body time to burn off the food you ate already and the fat stores that you have. So if you give yourself a window of 8 hours to eat and spend all 8 of them eating, IMO your not fully reaping the benefits of a fast. I have been fasting 2 or 3 times a week, for 20-24 hours at a time, I eat dinner, go to bed, wake up go to work, come home, work out, cook dinner and eat again so that is somewhere between 20-24 hours. This works great for me, but my goal is the last 20 pounds of weight loss, if this is not your goal, this wont work for you.
    My blog - About me, my family, and my hobbies!

    *Please ignore my horrible typing and grammar I am usually typing it all on my very uncooperative phone*

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •