Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Its still calories in vs calories out, isn't it? page

  1. #1
    stallion23's Avatar
    stallion23 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14

    Its still calories in vs calories out, isn't it?

    Primal Fuel
    I've read many of the blog posts written by Mr. Sisson and I have to say that I agree with much of what he says. My only gripe is that there seems to be an overall tone here that grains are the devil and as long as you don't eat them, you don't have to worry about calories in vs calories out. When calories are mentioned, it is often followed with a long explanation about "keeping them in context". I am very familiar with the macronutrients and their function within the human body. But calories still matter. If your body has a maintainance level of 2000 calories and you eat 2500 (even if those extra 500 calories come from fat/protein), your body will store it. Mr. Sisson even concedes that "calories still count" in this blog post.

    The reason why I bring this up is because the general notion seems to be here that grains, carbs, and refined sugars will make you fat. But everyone I know who has been successful at fat loss and uncovered a six pack still ate grains and sugars, but they were always in a calorie deficit (either through increased exercise or decreased consumption).

    I actually went 100% primal (nutritionally speaking) from the middle of last august to the end of last December. I had been weight training four times per week and performing HIIT 5-7x per week with the occasional bout of "chronic cardio" (5 mile run on the treadmill). I lost a lot of weight and got into the best shape of my life, but my hunger was out of control at times. Eating all the veggies, fats, and protein was okay during the day but at night I would constantly have cravings for fruit and nuts, sometimes eating in excess of 700 calories from those sources. Again, this goes against the idea that PB-style eating will decrease cravings. What I ultimately found was that I began to overeat on fats (cheeses and nuts especially) and fruits. My weight loss soon came to a standstill.

    A few months later I reintroduced carbs back in my diet but this time I monitored calories more closely. I instantly saw great results and decreased bodyfat within 2 weeks of eating grains but limiting overall calories. So I guess what I'm trying to get at here is that I think you guys are making a big deal out of demonizing grains, but at the end of the day, no matter what "context" you describe, you must create a calorie deficit over a long enough time frame to ensure continued fat loss.

  2. #2
    DFH's Avatar
    DFH
    DFH is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    1,778
    "Calories matter," CICO, cravings, and grains are four different topics.

    We just beat the CICO topic to death.

    Calories is just a different word for unit of energy. I don't think anyone really thinks that humans are immune to natural laws about energy. People just don't understand how they apply very well and will say just about anything.

    Grains are unhealthy regardless of your calorie counting. It's not just about that. It's also about inflammation you may not even know about.

  3. #3
    john_e_turner_ii's Avatar
    john_e_turner_ii is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Flower Mound, Texas
    Posts
    2,085
    stallion23, my experience has been the same as yours. Over the past year, I have experimented with macronutrients of high carb/low fat and high fat/low carb, with protein staying between 80g-150g per day. In the end, I have found that a caloric deficit is the main trigger for fat loss. I even found it easier to manage a caloric deficit by eating more carbs rather than less, much like you did. However, I have not reintroduced grains in my diet since I found that I feel much better without them. The carbs I consume are normally sweet potatoes, bananas, berries, a little dairy and nuts.

  4. #4
    Primal Toad's Avatar
    Primal Toad is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,983
    You are 100% in that if you burn more calories than you consume then you will essentially lose weight. But, its not that simple. A LOT is going on inside our bodies. Hormones and your metabolism makes a difference. How much you poop out makes a difference. Heat and sweat. How bloated you are. Your stress levels.

    It is virtually impossible today to know how many calories you burn. No one has any idea. And just 20-50 calories a day can make a HUGE difference. We can track how many calories we consume on a daily basis but not how much we burn.

    If you do the same shit all day every day then you can probably have an idea. But, our lives are constantly changing in todays world. Its fast paced. This is why counting calories is usually not the best route to fat loss unless you wish to starve yourself for some odd reason. One of my past co-workers was still eating grains - even white bread. But she admitted that she is constantly hungry. Its the only way she knows of how to lose fat. I don't wish to put anyone else in this position.
    Find me at aToadontheRoad.com. Cheers!

  5. #5
    Stabby's Avatar
    Stabby is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Stabsville
    Posts
    2,462
    Guys, why do we keep saying "caloric deficit" is if it wasn't as truism? Of course you need a caloric deficit but people treat energy expenditure as if it's a constant based upon their weight and "general activity level". Online calculators that claim to tell you how many calories you burned in a day are a sham, you can't know that. It changes. Ever be at work and be dragging your feet? Ever be bursting with energy doing the same thing? There ya go. Like has been mentioned before, inflammation ties into that. Low carb diets can backfire bigtime too. People who are overweight typically have trouble burning excess fat using their uncoupling proteins and when you eat a very high fat diet without full functioning of your uncoupling proteins you get a state called lipotoxicity where the cells become insulin resistant and mitochondrial function is inhibited. So perhaps a high fat diet isn't the best thing for long-term fat loss after all? Or maybe it could be all right if people fix their leptin resistance problems at the same time but usually people don't. If they eat lots of nuts and chicken fat I would say they definitely don't http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17343770 (you can google the title and find a free version)

    Ponderin' if "reduced mitochondrial function" could possibly mean anything with regards to calories out. That's just my guess, I could be wrong.
    Last edited by Stabby; 05-27-2011 at 06:47 PM.
    Stabbing conventional wisdom in its face.

    Anyone who wants to talk nutrition should PM me!

  6. #6
    john_e_turner_ii's Avatar
    john_e_turner_ii is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Flower Mound, Texas
    Posts
    2,085
    Stabby, I agree that the calorie calculators are not exact. They are a decent place to start, at least for me. It gave me an idea of what to look for as far as food choices. I had to make adjustments, and most others will too. Like Primal Toad says, activity plays a big part as well. My opinion is that we burn far fewer calories than we think we burn. The calories burned calculators such as on treadmills are just estimates as well. However, for me, once I found the sweet spot, maintaining my weight or losing weight became much easier. PB eating at that point made even more sense because I was able to eat nutritious and satisfying meals, but still be at a caloric deficit and lose fat. I never felt deprived or starving.

  7. #7
    Sue's Avatar
    Sue
    Sue is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,368
    Quote Originally Posted by Stabby View Post
    Guys, why do we keep saying "caloric deficit" is if it wasn't as truism? Of course you need a caloric deficit but people treat energy expenditure as if it's a constant based upon their weight and "general activity level". Online calculators that claim to tell you how many calories you burned in a day are a sham, you can't know that. It changes. Ever be at work and be dragging your feet? Ever be bursting with energy doing the same thing? There ya go. Like has been mentioned before, inflammation ties into that. Low carb diets can backfire bigtime too. People who are overweight typically have trouble burning excess fat using their uncoupling proteins and when you eat a very high fat diet without full functioning of your uncoupling proteins you get a state called lipotoxicity where the cells become insulin resistant and mitochondrial function is inhibited. So perhaps a high fat diet isn't the best thing for long-term fat loss after all? Or maybe it could be all right if people fix their leptin resistance problems at the same time but usually people don't. If they eat lots of nuts and chicken fat I would say they definitely don't http://journals.cambridge.org/downlo...f7ea49a2a202a6

    Ponderin' if "reduced mitochondrial function" could possibly mean anything with regards to calories out. That's just my guess, I could be wrong.

    Something to ponder. Tell me if
    That link not working.

    Or maybe as per Don's post LCers deficient in B-complex vitamins, Vitamin C and inerals which are involved in burning body fat. Those, like women who eat lower calories more likely to be deficient unlike men who eat more calories so get more of the nutrients. Maybe why men more successful with weight loss.
    Primal Wisdom: Nutrient density of dietary fats and high fat diets

  8. #8
    john_e_turner_ii's Avatar
    john_e_turner_ii is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Flower Mound, Texas
    Posts
    2,085
    Thanks for that link Sue. Interesting reading.

  9. #9
    Stabby's Avatar
    Stabby is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Stabsville
    Posts
    2,462
    Quote Originally Posted by john_e_turner_ii View Post
    Stabby, I agree that the calorie calculators are not exact. They are a decent place to start, at least for me. It gave me an idea of what to look for as far as food choices. I had to make adjustments, and most others will too. Like Primal Toad says, activity plays a big part as well. My opinion is that we burn far fewer calories than we think we burn. The calories burned calculators such as on treadmills are just estimates as well. However, for me, once I found the sweet spot, maintaining my weight or losing weight became much easier. PB eating at that point made even more sense because I was able to eat nutritious and satisfying meals, but still be at a caloric deficit and lose fat. I never felt deprived or starving.
    Of course. I didn't (I hope I didn't) say that if one happens to be able to reduce one's caloric intake without affecting energy levels and quality of life then if they do that they will lose fat faster. Not everyone can eat to the point of falling over and still be thin. People with lots of fat are a very different context than people without.
    Last edited by Stabby; 05-27-2011 at 06:47 PM.
    Stabbing conventional wisdom in its face.

    Anyone who wants to talk nutrition should PM me!

  10. #10
    Sambo's Avatar
    Sambo is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    38
    I suppose the point about calories is that a simple diet of meat/fish/eggs and vegies/fruits, without the high carb grain-based foods etc, should naturally be lower in calories than one with that extra crap. Somewhere along the line, that's been interpreted by some as 'calories don't matter', where the intention was that you should be able to be in deficit simply without counting and measuring obsessively.

    It then takes some discipline to not go berzerk with the bacon and fat.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •