Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Organic Fats(e.g butter, lard, tallow) or Organic meat? page

  1. #1
    Zedefone's Avatar
    Zedefone is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    36

    Organic Fats(e.g butter, lard, tallow) or Organic meat?

    Hello guys, as you guys know, organic stuff is no cheap stuff(esp for a student like me). I read that Mark advocates that spending on organic meat is more important than organic produce. And i also heard that the major difference between organic and commercial meat is mainly the fat profile, which is where the antibiotics, hormones injected stays at?

    So i would like to ask a question, which is more value for money to spend my money on? Organic meat or organic fats like lard, butter, tallow, bacon? Because from the explanation above, commercial fats will be more harmful and it's wiser to spend money on organic fats(used for cooking) than meat if i were to choose only one?

  2. #2
    breadsauce's Avatar
    breadsauce is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    2,196
    I think I'd agree with you and go for organic fats to cook your (lean) non-organic meat in. And cheap fish - think mackerel, herring, sardines for instance.

  3. #3
    it1958's Avatar
    it1958 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    414
    I am an advocate of Bee Wilder's "Healing Naturally" who follows a basic Paleo eating plan. She, too, would prefer that we use organic, but she also understands financial constraints. I've searched through her archives and found these tidbits:

    "Don't be overly concerned about quality since even pasteurized butter contains important nutrients. " [just buy unsalted and add your own GOOD sea salt.]

    "Farm fish are also okay if they are not sick, which would be obvious. Companies couldn't put farm fish on the market if they were sick anyway."

    "it is wise to eliminate as many toxins as possible, but use good judgement and also consider your resources and finances. I wouldn't want anyone
    to think they are doing themselves a disservice by consuming non-organic meats."

    "+++It much more important to obtain the nutrients in them rather than become overly concerned about possible toxins [such as mercury or antibiotics in meat]. "

    "It is totally false that antibiotics, vaccines, hormone treatments, etc. are in
    commercial meats, since all animal bodies detoxify them just like ours do.
    Also, they butcher meats long before the animal could be very unhealthy, i.e.
    have cancer, etc.

    So it is more important to eat such meats than to avoid them, since meat is meat
    and it will contain a lot of great nutrients and fats.

    However, organic or certified organic animals that are fed natural foods they
    bodies are designed to have will have healthier meats and fats since their meat
    and fat will be constructed according to the way Nature intended."

  4. #4
    Sun's Avatar
    Sun
    Sun is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by it1958 View Post
    "It is totally false that antibiotics, vaccines, hormone treatments, etc. are in
    commercial meats, since all animal bodies detoxify them just like ours do.
    Also, they butcher meats long before the animal could be very unhealthy, i.e.
    have cancer, etc."
    She's in a very small minority of people in the health community if she thinks that. Detox is hampered by poor diet, stress, etc., which are all things that these poor animals endure. There is just so very much evidence to the contrary of her claims. I'm not sure where she gets them from.

  5. #5
    Apex Predator's Avatar
    Apex Predator is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,354
    Organic fat is priority #1, IMO.

  6. #6
    it1958's Avatar
    it1958 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    414
    Quote Originally Posted by Sun View Post
    She's in a very small minority of people in the health community if she thinks that. Detox is hampered by poor diet, stress, etc., which are all things that these poor animals endure. There is just so very much evidence to the contrary of her claims. I'm not sure where she gets them from.
    Well....? Aren't we in the paleo world in the minority, too? Just because she is in the 'very small minority', does that make her wrong?

    I had to go back through more posts (gladly) to find her reasoning and here it is:

    "Why Non-Organic Meats Are Safe to Eat

    Re: Antibiotics, Pesticides, Growth Hormones, etc. in Non-Organic Meats

    "It is a fact" that all bodies (animal, human, fish, etc.) chemically change
    everything consumed, and they remove (detoxify) substances like antibiotics,
    vaccines, pesticides, toxins, etc. Therefore those substances are not in the
    makeup (construction) of meat or fat cells so they are safe to consume.

    It is true those substances can make the animals sick, however the animals are
    slaughtered long before they become unhealthy.

    The following is from: Myths, Distortions and Lies About Beef. Organic, Pesticides, Antibiotics and Health.

    1) Antibiotics are removed by the body of the animal over time just as they are
    in humans. The administration of antibiotics is stopped in advance of slaughter
    to allow the antibiotics to be removed naturally by the animal. Therefore, we
    should have very little concern about the presence of antibiotics in the meat we
    purchase at the supermarket, cook, and serve to our families.

    2) Hormones are naturally present in infinitesimal amounts in all meat, whether
    from implanted animals or not. There is more estrogen in plant-source foods,
    especially soy, than there is in meat. The human body produces hormones in
    quantities much greater than would ever be consumed by eating beef or other
    foods. Hormones in beef from implanted steers have no physiological significance
    for humans whatsoever. The estrogen level in a 3-oz. serving of beef from an
    implanted steer is 1.85 nanograms. (A nanogram is a billionth of a gram.) The
    level in the same size portion of beef from a non-implanted steer is 1.3
    nanograms. By comparison, a non-pregnant woman produces 480,000 nanograms of
    estrogen daily.

    3) . . .the animal's liver removes the pesticide in the same way as it does in
    humans."

    ETA link (from her forum): <http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/candidasupport/message/100328>
    Last edited by it1958; 05-25-2011 at 03:38 PM.

  7. #7
    Zed's Avatar
    Zed
    Zed is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Bronx, NY
    Posts
    341
    Quote Originally Posted by Sun View Post
    She's in a very small minority of people in the health community if she thinks that. Detox is hampered by poor diet, stress, etc., which are all things that these poor animals endure. There is just so very much evidence to the contrary of her claims. I'm not sure where she gets them from.
    What evidence is there that CAFO meats have dangerous amounts of hormones, antibiotics, etc? Even Mark admitted that any antibiotics given to animals are not present in the meat products (this agree with the fact that all farmers are obligated by law to withdraw the injection of antibiotics 21 days before slaughter to eliminate them from the body)

    Don made a great series on the issue--->Primal Wisdom: A Practically Primal Perspective on Conventional Beef, Part 1: Hormones

    Primal Wisdom: The Practically Primal Guide to Conventional Beef, Part 2: Antibiotics, Chemicals, and Pesticides

    I have not seen any rebuttal to the above......

    Listen, i am all for organic/local/pasture raised animals (the way nature intended) (and 50% of my weekly meats comes from these animals), but the claim that CAFO meats have dangerous amounts of hormones, antibiotics, etc, seem like a myth to me and others. Not surprising, the only ones who told me this throughout my life were vegans/vegetarians. The nutrition found in meat/organs (whether it is CAFO or not not) outweighs any potential health risks involved eating CAFO meats.

    The only issues I see with CAFO meats are omega 6:3 ratio (not a issue with beef, lamb, goat, and bison), animal welfare and environmental status. As I and others have mention in this site and elsewhere, not eating grains, sugar, processed meats and highly rancid vegetable oil is what really matters. This does not mean that you should not aim for organic/local/pasture animals, and to some extent (organic fruits/veggies) (because you should), but rather, each of us needs to make choices based on our financial situation. What is really important is eating WHOLE FOODS (fruits, vegetables, nuts, tubers, meats, fats, etc), eliminating inflammation, and this alone will bring good health.
    Last edited by Zed; 05-25-2011 at 05:47 PM.

  8. #8
    Zedefone's Avatar
    Zedefone is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    36
    Wow, thanks alot guys, there is alot of wonderful information here which i will save for reading later.

    I didn't know there are such different perspectives on this issue, but i think it makes me feel better as a student with limited financial power to buy organic meats and have no options other than either eating non-organic meat or not eating meat. Like what Zed mentioned, i guess it's the fundamental ''primal/paleo eating'' that is important. Thanks for the links on the different perspective on meat again.

  9. #9
    breadsauce's Avatar
    breadsauce is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    2,196
    Don't overlook the fact that the fat you eat - butter, lard, tallow, cream etc - will have a better omega 3 / 6 balance if it is organic, and a higher omega 6 content if it is commercially reared.

    I'd go for eating any meat, but only organic / grass fed fats.

  10. #10
    Zed's Avatar
    Zed
    Zed is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Bronx, NY
    Posts
    341
    Primal Blueprint Expert Certification
    Quote Originally Posted by breadsauce View Post
    Don't overlook the fact that the fat you eat - butter, lard, tallow, cream etc - will have a better omega 3 / 6 balance if it is organic, and a higher omega 6 content if it is commercially reared.

    I'd go for eating any meat, but only organic / grass fed fats.
    We need to put this into perspective.

    While it is true that non organic/pasture animals will have unnatural ratio of omega 6:3 and total PUFA will increase, such facts are insignificant when it comes to beef/bison, as both have very little PUFA/omega 6 to begin with, whether it is grass-finished or grain-finished compare to fatty cuts of chicken/pork. Lamb/Goat also have very PUFA compare to chicken/pork. In other words, if you limit your consumption of chicken, pork, highly rancid vegetable oils, avocados, and most nuts, and stick to beef/bison/goat/lamb as your meat sources (whether it is from grain-finished or grass-finished animals), your omega 6:3 ratio will not be all that bad, and a optimum ratio can be obtained either by eating weekly servings of fatty fish or by taking fish oil, the later being less ideal.

    While I buy organic/grass-fed/local meats, I also buy CAFO beef/lamb (usually the fatty cuts), and even when I eat CAFO beef/lamb, my average omega 6:3 ratio is 5:1-4:1 and total PUFA is 10 grams or less.

    Butter and Cream (whether it is from grass-finished cows or not) have very little PUFA and omega 6 to begin with. Unless one eat a insanely amount of CAFO beef/lamb/bison/butter/cream, then I wouldn't worry amount them.
    Last edited by Zed; 05-26-2011 at 02:42 AM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •