Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Is Sugar Toxic? (From the New York Times) page

  1. #1
    keithpowers's Avatar
    keithpowers is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    625

    Is Sugar Toxic? (From the New York Times)

    Primal Fuel
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/ma...pagewanted=all

    I think we all know the answer... but I thought it interesting that it made it into the mainstream NYT...
    Peak weight on Standard American Diet: 316.8 lbs
    Initial Weight When Starting Primal: 275 lbs
    Current weight: 210.8 lbs
    Goal weight: 220 lbs (or less): MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

    The way "ChooseMyPlate.gov" should have looked:
    ChooseMyPlate

  2. #2
    HillsideGina's Avatar
    HillsideGina is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    517
    Written by Gary Taubes. Sugar has been more difficult for me to cut completely than grains. I've decided to stop the daily chocolate cheats, and now I'm working on the sugar or honey in my tea.

  3. #3
    Stabby's Avatar
    Stabby is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Stabsville
    Posts
    2,463
    Don't you know the rules?! Don't talk about religion, politics or Gary Taubes! Bah!

    Nah, kidding.

    I enjoyed the longer article he did a week ago. I see sugar as a contextual toxin, always a poor choice but not always such a terrible choice. It can cause steatosis and is undeniably linked to diseases and obesity in assessments of populations but these populations also have high levels of inflammation and deficiencies in important nutrients like choline that prevent the steatosis. It can raise triglycerides potently although depending upon nutrient status and inflammation it will generate less triglycerides and more glycogen. It feeds pathogens but again the catalyst appears to be an insufficient junk diet. Also it appears to be dose-dependent so a little like 20g in some cheesecake a few times a week is different than slugging pepsi. Only very healthy people are candidates to consume sugar in a benign manner. The way that people tend to consume it in North America is anything but benign.

    HFCS is an interesting kink in the issue. People say that it is the same as sucrose but we know that the speed that fructose hits the liver partially determines its lipogenic effect. HFCS has free fructose which doesn't have to be snapped by sucrase, although we can expect both to hit the liver sufficiently quickly to contribute to the fatty liver.

    Definitely not just an empty calorie
    Stabbing conventional wisdom in its face.

    Anyone who wants to talk nutrition should PM me!

  4. #4
    Acteon's Avatar
    Acteon is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    330
    PrimalCon New York
    Every single person who consumed sugar before 1887 is now dead. Sad but true.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •