Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Primal evidence FOR Chronic Cardio page

  1. #1
    jbr613's Avatar
    jbr613 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1

    1

    Primal Fuel


    I'm a huge believer in the Primal Blueprint. Since adapting it in May of this year, I've lost 10 lbs (I wasn't particularly overweight beforehand) and feel and think better than I have in years. One area where I haven't followed the blueprint closely is in continuing my trail running. I felt guilty about being one of Mark's Chronic Cardio gang, but I've loved it too much to give it up, plus it FELT right intuitively.


    Yesterday (10/27/09), there was an article in the NY Times that seems to support the running habit FROM A PRIMAL PERSPECTIVE. Entitled "The Human Body is Built for Distance" (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/health/27well.html), it reads almost like a chapter from Mark's book, citing anthropology, anatomy and biomechanics in support of the argument that human beings are meant to run long distances.


    There are caveats, such as avoiding high-tech, highly engineered running shoes, but at its core, like Mark's book, the argument makes sense to me. I'd be interested in whether others (and Mark?) think there's enough evidence here to re-examine the rule against running.


  2. #2
    MariaNYC's Avatar
    MariaNYC is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    252

    1



    Mark has previously addressed one of the studies mentioned in the NYT article. Read his take on it here:


    http://www.marksdailyapple.com/did-h...tance-runners/

    Everything in moderation, including moderation.

  3. #3
    OnTheBayou's Avatar
    OnTheBayou is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sarasota, Florida, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    152

    1



    There's a perfect example of why Tiny URL is useful on this site.


    Could you redo that, jbr613?


    Without saying all I'm tempted to, maybe we do well on running 5-10 miles when we really, really need to. But not marathons. And if we are such natural long distance runners, how is it that running has been considered painful and something to avoid for most of civilized history? It's only been the last 30 years that so many average folk have taken up running. Complete with all that body damage and even death. Hmmmmmmm.......


  4. #4
    claude512's Avatar
    claude512 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Luxembourg
    Posts
    118

    1



    we are built for distance (look at the big migrations, from africa to south america... long distance anyone?), but not necessarily running it! rather a slow walk, which is a big part of the primal blueprint anyway (and exactly what mark says in the quoted link)


  5. #5
    PrimalK's Avatar
    PrimalK is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    6

    1



    I agree that we are built for distance, but not running it. Apart from the chronic cardio issue, it is bad for many of your joints, because of the high impact nature of the activity (ankles, knees, hips, lumbar spine, etc).


    Not that I haven't done it myself, I might add!


  6. #6
    chowza's Avatar
    chowza is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    79

    1



    Yeah, I think there's a big difference in impact on your overall health between running 26.2 miles nonstop on a road surface with high-tech shoes that provide lots of "support," and running the same distance barefoot or in minimal footwear, stopping to walk along the way.

    Check out my blog here.

  7. #7
    Phil-SC's Avatar
    Phil-SC is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    267

    1



    For what it's worth...I think shorter distances (5K or even maybe 10k) might be fine...I think these may qulaity as short, intense running distances..but remember the Greek legend about the marathon...the original marathoner suppossedly dropped dead after he had run the 26 miles...


    Uggg!


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •