Especially before easily available and effective birthcontrol, sex was of much greater consequence to women than it was to men. Society evolved around this biological truth, and women became the gatekeepers to sex. Women don't generally stigmatize men who tomcat around because the underlying signal is that other gatekeepers are allowing him to have sex with them, so he must be high-quality. Women are stigmatized for sleeping around because it calls into question their judgement as a gatekeeper.
Men only like loose women on the level that they like a casino with 'loose slots'. They'll play, but they won't invest. Feminism does a great injustice (among many) by teaching women that they can use birthcontrol and sleep around like men without consequence. High quality men will not invest in a woman who has taken this attitude.
Your definition of "high quality" and my definition of "ignorant" obviously cover the same ground.
There are men who either learn to think for themselves, or who aren't brought up as judgmental bigots, who could care less where or with whom a woman has been before him. It really makes no difference. It has nothing to do with some arbitrary measure of quality. It only has to occur to a man that though a double standard may have served a purpose at some point in history, that point is moot now to understand this.
“You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.”
And that's why I'm here eating HFLC Primal/Paleo.
i'll be good.
Every time I hear the dirty word 'exercise', I wash my mouth out with chocolate.
GOTD: a family moved into the house behind mine, so now i can't walk the house naked at night anymore!