Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: more sets, fewer reps--or--fewer sets, more reps? page

  1. #1
    primalrob's Avatar
    primalrob is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Manchester, NH
    Posts
    2,142

    more sets, fewer reps--or--fewer sets, more reps?

    Primal Fuel
    i'm wondering...

    when it comes to body weight exercises, is it better to do several sets of a lower, set amount of reps (say 5 sets of 6 pullups), or fewer sets with higher reps (3 sets of 10)?
    i usually do more sets, a la simplefit, but today i three sets of exercises until failure...and i was way more spent by the end.

    is one way better for strength? one for endurance? thoughts? opinions?

  2. #2
    profdjj's Avatar
    profdjj is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    348
    Both, actually. It's called "muscle confusion". Confuse your muscles as much as possible and you'll see greater results. So, one week do high reps/low weights amd the next week do low reps/high weights.

  3. #3
    Velocity's Avatar
    Velocity is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Coral Gables, FL
    Posts
    937
    Quote Originally Posted by primalrob View Post
    is one way better for strength? one for endurance? thoughts? opinions?
    Yes. Lower volume, more challenging weight/exercise tends to yield more strength; a higher volume with an easier exercise will add endurance. For instance, doing sets of 3-5 explosive pull-ups will aid in power production and strength; sets of 10 conventional pull-ups (or more) will aid in muscular endurance.

    Resistance training is resistance training. The same principles apply for bodyweight training as in conventional weight training.
    Are you a college student, trying to navigate college while being Primal? Do you know any other PB college students on a tight budget? Heck, for that matter, are YOU trying to live Primal on a budget? Enroll at Primal University!

    For after all what is man in nature? A nothing in relation to infinity, all in relation to nothing, a central point between nothing and all and infinitely far from understanding either.
    -- Blaise Pascal

  4. #4
    DIESEL's Avatar
    DIESEL is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Nicholasville, Kentucky
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocity View Post
    Yes. Lower volume, more challenging weight/exercise tends to yield more strength; a higher volume with an easier exercise will add endurance.
    This in turn will offer two "looks" if you will. Heavy weights with lower reps will result with a bigger, thicker, stronger muscle build. Lower weight with more reps will result in a much leaner, toned muscle not capable of handling the super heavy weights but able to preform better on the cardio side. It depends on what kind of look you going for.

  5. #5
    Vick's Avatar
    Vick is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    604
    Quote Originally Posted by profdjj View Post
    Both, actually. It's called "muscle confusion". Confuse your muscles as much as possible and you'll see greater results. So, one week do high reps/low weights amd the next week do low reps/high weights.
    I'm sorry but it takes a brain to be confused. Muscles don't have a brain, therefore they can't be confused. It comes do to how does the body respond to a physical test. The body will do everything it can to become stronger before it grows more muscle. Growing more muscle means more food to feed the body... finding food was often a problem in ancient times... therefore the body will use synaptic facilitation and other means to get stronger without growing muscle mass.

    I can't answer your question. However for long term health you need to exercise to promote muscle mass and increase vo2.

  6. #6
    primalrob's Avatar
    primalrob is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Manchester, NH
    Posts
    2,142
    thanks for the feedback, everyone. i probably will mix things up a bit. i'm really liking bodyweight exercises more than i ever did getting under the bar. it's a little harder to measure strength since 50 pushups doesn't really equal a specific bench press weight (it doesn't, right?), but i feel just as strong and more fit and able than i ever have before. but i've hit a bit of a stall, so i'll see if mixing short, intense sets with longer, controlled sets helps me get to the point where i can one day do a muscle up and flag.

  7. #7
    Al_Kavadlo's Avatar
    Al_Kavadlo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,399
    There was another post about this recently, so I pretty much just cut and pasted what I wrote in that post:

    There is no one best way to train. There are certainly some methods that are more effective than others, but it need not be a question of high rep vs. high weight as the two are not at odds with each other as far as I can tell. In the world of bodyweight training, the same people are usually good at both. Take me for example - I can do a one arm pull-up for one rep strength (or two reps on a good day!) AND I can also do a crapload of regular two arm pull-ups. What does that tell you?

    Stop worrying about finding the "holy grail" workout plan and just focus on training hard and training consistently. I discuss this idea in more detail in my book.
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they couldn't be more different."

    "You can have anything you want, but you can't have everything you want."

    My blog: http://www.AlKavadlo.com


  8. #8
    iniQuity's Avatar
    iniQuity is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Northern NJ
    Posts
    5,683
    Quote Originally Posted by primalrob View Post
    i'm wondering...

    when it comes to body weight exercises, is it better to do several sets of a lower, set amount of reps (say 5 sets of 6 pullups), or fewer sets with higher reps (3 sets of 10)?
    i usually do more sets, a la simplefit, but today i three sets of exercises until failure...and i was way more spent by the end.

    is one way better for strength? one for endurance? thoughts? opinions?
    While it’s always best to do a bit of both, the breakdown of strength vs. endurance as I understand it is this:

    - More tension (be it added weight or your own bodyweight) and fewer reps: strength gains
    - Less tension (less weight) and higher reps: muscular endurance.

    But you should work on both because you need both, what do you get out of being strong if you crap out after 15 reps? Inversely, what’s the point of doing 40 light reps and never being able to do 5 heavy ones?

    I also think one follows the other. For instance, let’s say someone can’t yet do a good push-up. They work on knee push ups and can manage only three for a while (so they’re developing strength, if the above breakdown holds) after a while of working their three reps they manage to work up to 15 good reps, in theory both their strength and muscle endurance have gone up.
    Now, they’re ready to tackle regular push-ups, but again they can’t do more than 3, so they plug away for a few weeks getting their strength up with their 3 to 5 reps, eventually working up to 20, so again both strength and muscle endurance have increased.
    Now they’re elevating their feet, same idea, 3-5 at first because they’re not strong enough, eventually 15-20.

    And on and on …

    Make sense? I think I’ve got it right…

  9. #9
    Al_Kavadlo's Avatar
    Al_Kavadlo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,399
    Quote Originally Posted by iniQuity View Post
    let’s say someone can’t yet do a good push-up. They work on knee push ups and can manage only three for a while (so they’re developing strength, if the above breakdown holds) after a while of working their three reps they manage to work up to 15 good reps, in theory both their strength and muscle endurance have gone up.
    Now, they’re ready to tackle regular push-ups, but again they can’t do more than 3, so they plug away for a few weeks getting their strength up with their 3 to 5 reps, eventually working up to 20, so again both strength and muscle endurance have increased.
    Now they’re elevating their feet, same idea, 3-5 at first because they’re not strong enough, eventually 15-20.

    And on and on …

    Make sense? I think I’ve got it right…
    I think so, too - great way of explaining it! Imagine how many knee push-ups this hypothetical person could do by this point.
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they couldn't be more different."

    "You can have anything you want, but you can't have everything you want."

    My blog: http://www.AlKavadlo.com


  10. #10
    primalclubber's Avatar
    primalclubber is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    286
    Quote Originally Posted by Al_Kavadlo View Post
    There was another post about this recently, so I pretty much just cut and pasted what I wrote in that post:

    There is no one best way to train. There are certainly some methods that are more effective than others, but it need not be a question of high rep vs. high weight as the two are not at odds with each other as far as I can tell. In the world of bodyweight training, the same people are usually good at both. Take me for example - I can do a one arm pull-up for one rep strength (or two reps on a good day!) AND I can also do a crapload of regular two arm pull-ups. What does that tell you?

    Stop worrying about finding the "holy grail" workout plan and just focus on training hard and training consistently. I discuss this idea in more detail in my book.
    +1

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •