Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Visceral vs subcutaneous fat page

  1. #1
    NorthernMonkeyGirl's Avatar
    NorthernMonkeyGirl is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,563

    Question Visceral vs subcutaneous fat

    Primal Fuel
    Quick query / confusion here

    Visceral fat is the bad stuff, wrapping round your organs, releasing hormones and all kinds of nasties.
    Subcutaneous fat just kinda sits there and..well, sits there. Usually on your bum and thighs!

    I keep hearing that all beer bellies, love handles etc MUST be visceral fat. But - given my "apple" body shape - I can prod through the flab (ha!) and find my abs UNDERNEATH. So my own pot belly is subcutaneous fat...right? I'm not saying there's no visceral there as well, but same applies when I prod the muffin top too. Nice to know I have muscles anyway

    So in theory, is my subcutaneous wobbliness less harmful than "real" visceral fat, despite giving me the same body shape?

    Just taking a thought for a walk...

  2. #2
    Lojasmo's Avatar
    Lojasmo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Minnesnowta
    Posts
    977
    You probably need to do both skin fold measurements, and impedance testing to suss out your visceral fat burden.

  3. #3
    cillakat's Avatar
    cillakat is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    4,473
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthernMonkeyGirl View Post
    Quick query / confusion here

    Visceral fat is the bad stuff, wrapping round your organs, releasing hormones and all kinds of nasties.
    Subcutaneous fat just kinda sits there and..well, sits there. Usually on your bum and thighs!

    I keep hearing that all beer bellies, love handles etc MUST be visceral fat. But - given my "apple" body shape - I can prod through the flab (ha!) and find my abs UNDERNEATH. So my own pot belly is subcutaneous fat...right? I'm not saying there's no visceral there as well, but same applies when I prod the muffin top too. Nice to know I have muscles anyway

    So in theory, is my subcutaneous wobbliness less harmful than "real" visceral fat, despite giving me the same body shape?

    Just taking a thought for a walk...
    Apple body shapes tend to have visceral fat. Pear and hourglass tend toward subq fat.



    iherb referral code CIL457- $5 off first order


  4. #4
    NorthernMonkeyGirl's Avatar
    NorthernMonkeyGirl is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,563
    Thanks for the responses, but perhaps I didn't phrase my question well.
    Is it still the visceral fat if it lies between my skin and my muscle (ie in a subcutaneous position)?

  5. #5
    Bodhi's Avatar
    Bodhi is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Near Tulsa, Ok
    Posts
    389
    If it is between your muscle and skin it is Subcutaneous fat.

  6. #6
    Lojasmo's Avatar
    Lojasmo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Minnesnowta
    Posts
    977
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthernMonkeyGirl View Post
    Thanks for the responses, but perhaps I didn't phrase my question well.
    Is it still the visceral fat if it lies between my skin and my muscle (ie in a subcutaneous position)?
    No.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •