Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: ideal body fat percentag in females page

  1. #1
    Sonnenblume's Avatar
    Sonnenblume is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    142

    ideal body fat percentag in females

    Primal Blueprint Expert Certification
    I have just finished the book "The Primal Blueprint". Mark claims that a body fat percentage between 12-20% is healthiest for females. I fluctuate between 17-19%, maybe I was 20-21% right after I had my daughter but I cannot imagine a healthy way to go lower than 17, maybe 16%. I think I would feel drained and I wouldn`t look the way I like myself. Also, fertility seems to be compromised in some women that are below 17%. I always thought that 17-22% is a range that is a realistic goal for most women, maybe lower for some athletes and many women look and feel good at 23-24%. But 12%? I think Mark made a mistake here....
    What do you think?

  2. #2
    Shrinking_Violet's Avatar
    Shrinking_Violet is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire, though originally from Sheffield
    Posts
    803
    No he didn't because he never said that. Methinks you need to read the book again. I've been through it and I can find no mention of any figures at all.

    He would NEVER recommend something so stupidly unhealthy! Are you SURE you've read the book...?!
    La tristesse durera toujours...

  3. #3
    Sonnenblume's Avatar
    Sonnenblume is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    142
    p. 167: "By breaking free from the cycle of carbs fueling stressful, carb-burning Chronic Cardio workouts, you can easily get into the ideal body fat percentage range of 8 to 15 percent for men and 12-20 percent for women". It wasn`t me who didn`t read the book, but English not being my mother tongue, I wonder if this sentence leaves room for misinterpretation??

  4. #4
    Shrinking_Violet's Avatar
    Shrinking_Violet is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire, though originally from Sheffield
    Posts
    803
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonnenblume View Post
    p. 167: "By breaking free from the cycle of carbs fueling stressful, carb-burning Chronic Cardio workouts, you can easily get into the ideal body fat percentage range of 8 to 15 percent for men and 12-20 percent for women". It wasn`t me who didn`t read the book, but English not being my mother tongue, I wonder if this sentence leaves room for misinterpretation??
    Well, Sunflower, German's not mine (if you were French, no probs! Spanish? Ditto) but I never did pass O Level German!) I apologise, I'll have a re read...

    He does give a wide range, now I've seen it in context; 12% is top end of essential and 20% the top end of athletic. I think he's being very ambitious. Yes, you're right, but I do agree that somewhere between 20 and 25%'s more realistic (at least it is for me!)
    Last edited by Shrinking_Violet; 10-27-2010 at 04:05 AM. Reason: Because I'm too dense to translate her username correctly!
    La tristesse durera toujours...

  5. #5
    unchatenfrance's Avatar
    unchatenfrance is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    788
    I think it needs to be distinguished that the lower range (12-16% or so) is an appropriate level for serious female athletes, not for average women. I think what Mark is trying to say is that elite athletes can be healthy at a low percentage, but anything under 12 is asking for serious trouble. He's certainly not saying that all women should strive to reach 12%. Compromised fertility is not strictly and exclusively related to BF% - I have certainly been amenorrheic at *nowhere near* 12% BF!

  6. #6
    erica057's Avatar
    erica057 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    436
    Unless you are using an extraordinarily accurate method of body fat testing (i.e. Dexa scan) I really wouldn't think about it too much. For example, calipers told me I was 17.7% while BodPod said 27% and bioelectrical impedence said somewhere between the two. People put too much stock in the number when it's just way too hard to measure accurately.

    Are you eating healthy? Do you lift heavy things? Can you do activities like go for a hike or play a pick-up game of basketball without getting winded? Are you of a reasonable weight and shape? If so, I wouldn't worry about BF%.
    My food blog ~ http://stuffimakemyhusband.blogspot.com
    My primal success story

    "Boxing seems to contain so complete and so powerful an image of life -- life's beauty, vulnerability, despair, incalculable and often self-destructive courage -- that boxing IS life, and hardly a mere game." --Joyce Carol Oates

  7. #7
    MalPaz's Avatar
    MalPaz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    2,790
    ideal= when you are happy and when you eat when your hungry and stop when your full while focusing on nutrient dense variety in food.

    end of rant.... if your healthy youll naturally have a good BF % and like all things, only YOU can determine where that falls there's no 'point' to get to in bodyfat

  8. #8
    mhoward's Avatar
    mhoward is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    denver
    Posts
    41
    The ideal BF % is 'what? i don't care what it is.' Just my two cents.

  9. #9
    979roadrunner's Avatar
    979roadrunner is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Columbus, Texas
    Posts
    273
    A large differance from the accepted 'healthy' range of 21+ percent. Of course, there are athletes far below the male 'healthy' range of 8+ (I dream of 10)
    I'm not old, I'm Vintage!

  10. #10
    spakesneaker's Avatar
    spakesneaker is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,576
    Huh, I just looked it up, and apparently 21-24% body fat for women is fitness, and 25-31% is acceptable, and anything over that is obese. 12-20% fits under 'athlete' and 'essential fat.' I've heard it defined in terms of BMI, with people assuming that BMI can correspond to body fat, saying that 19-25 is normal but 17-23 is ideal.

    I wonder if women don't necessarily need more body fat to menstruate, but rather more *mass*. I know a girl who eats practically nothing, runs 5 miles a day, is skinny but not fit (in terms of body composition)... who doesn't menstruate. I wonder if it's also b/c of the stressors usually put on the body to get to really low weights, not necessarily b/c of the weight itself, b/c that weight could be natural for someone else at the same height, or even for the same person given other food and exercise conditions.

    But I do think it's a matter of liking how you look. I think my ideal for myself would probably be at a higher BF% than most of the people here, but I don't really fret about it.
    Last edited by spakesneaker; 10-28-2010 at 06:04 AM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •