Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: How high is too high, Vit D page

  1. #1
    LessofMimi's Avatar
    LessofMimi is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    721

    How high is too high, Vit D

    Primal Blueprint Expert Certification
    I just got my latest results and my Vit D (25-H) went from 20.6 (in December '09) to 98.8 July 1st, '10.

    Now, I've been supplementing - anywhere from 2000 IU per day at 1st to a high of 30K IU due to recurrent lung issues/bronchitis bordering on pneumonia, allergies/breathing difficulties, etc that started in the spring. I went down to 6K IU for a week before the blood test due to limited funds and needing to ration out the remaining D3. I'm currently taking 10K per day.

    I've also been in the sun for the 1st time in 25 years. ~ 1 month in the pool, 1-3 hours (after 3pm) per day. No sunscreen.

    Doc said to chill on the supplements - she wants me to ratchet it back to 400-800 units per day. Um, I can't cut these capsules, so minimum is 2000 a day. rofl. I'm not sure if that will be enough to keep the lung issues at bay (but I'm willing to experiment) or if I'm doing some good for those w/ all the sun exposure, too.

    So - is there such a thing as too much of a good thing? Am I doing myself harm having such a high level of D? Should I cut the supplement to the minimum and keep the sun-exposure going? What am I talking about - I'm not stopping the sun-tingle I get now.
    And what do I do if the lung problems come back?

    Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

    Everything else looks FABU, btw - and I credit LC/Primal for it.
    Melissa Fritcher - 330/252/150
    http://lessofmimi.wordpress.com
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead.

  2. #2
    SerialSinner's Avatar
    SerialSinner is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    286
    I am also supplementing and once I reach your level I would also like to know how to keep it within healthy limits without having to test continously (although that's probably unavoidable). Hopefully Cillakat will jump in with some advice.
    “Every saint has a past and every sinner has a future.” -Oscar Wilde
    "The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." -George Bernard Shaw
    "The trouble with jogging is that the ice falls out of your glass." -Martin Mull

  3. #3
    slacker's Avatar
    slacker is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Pacific Northwest USA
    Posts
    557
    Too much will result in a too high blood calcium level. I would look on the Vitamin D Council web site for guidance on how to figure it out. But, I think I remember Cannell (Vit D Council doc) saying he wanted his patients up to 100, but not above. If I were you, I would drop down to one 2000 iu cap per day until you get that figured out.

  4. #4
    Bisous's Avatar
    Bisous is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    468
    The vitamin D council guys seems to settle on 50-80 as a good level. Though without symptoms of hypercalcemia (bone pain, kidney stones, insomnia, fatigue, depression, hair thinning) and nl serum calcium, 98 is probably fine. As long as you don't have hyperparathyroidism, and you have adequate calcium (though less need for RDA-type amounts with adequate D), A, and K2, D is fine. I think a certain percentage of folks will get toxic on 10,000 IU daily. And probably no need to supplement on days you hang out in the sun. I'm deficient as of early April level (31), will recheck in a few months after 4000-6000 IU a day (none on sun days, though), will try to maintain on 2000-5000 a day one the level is good.

  5. #5
    TheGrappler's Avatar
    TheGrappler is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Inwood, New York
    Posts
    727
    Experiment! tell us what happens! lol. 30k is insane!!
    "I know what my body needs and what it can handle. There's no better way to achieve my goal than what im doing now. If my regimen leads to my death, be it in six days or six months...I will die fullfiled. The outcome is irrelavent so long as i steer towards my fate. If death is to be my prize, i welcome it with open arms."

    "A pound of meat a day keeps the doctor away"

  6. #6
    LessofMimi's Avatar
    LessofMimi is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    721
    Quote Originally Posted by TheGrappler View Post
    Experiment! tell us what happens! lol. 30k is insane!!
    LOL - the capsules are very small, thank goodness. I was taking 10K three times a day at that point. (I take a lot of supplements per day, no meds anymore, thank goodness. Just vitamins, and happy pills)

    Yes, I do recall seeing something about our bodies uptaking more calcium when adequate levels of D are achieved, and I did cut out my Cal supplement a couple of weeks ago.

    I'm sure the sun would be adequate on the days I do go out, but I take the supplements as much for the lung issues as anything. I do suppose I could cut back to one a day and then bolus if I can't breathe. lol

    Should I request blood calcium testing due to the upper-level-normal D?
    Melissa Fritcher - 330/252/150
    http://lessofmimi.wordpress.com
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead.

  7. #7
    Barb's Avatar
    Barb is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA USA
    Posts
    415
    I think you will be just fine on one 2000 unit capsule a day plus sun exposure as a maintenance dose now that you are at the very high range of normal. In the dead of winter you might want to go up to 4000 units/day for maintenance.

  8. #8
    Stabby's Avatar
    Stabby is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Stabsville
    Posts
    2,462
    Quick go see if you have sunlight coming out of your ears. Post pictures if so.
    Stabbing conventional wisdom in its face.

    Anyone who wants to talk nutrition should PM me!

  9. #9
    LessofMimi's Avatar
    LessofMimi is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    721
    Quote Originally Posted by Stabby View Post
    Quick go see if you have sunlight coming out of your ears. Post pictures if so.
    ROFLMAO!!! I do think I glow now, but I like to think it's just from better health. ROFL
    Melissa Fritcher - 330/252/150
    http://lessofmimi.wordpress.com
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead.

  10. #10
    cillakat's Avatar
    cillakat is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    4,473
    Quote Originally Posted by LessofMimi View Post
    - is there such a thing as too much of a good thing?
    Absolutely.

    Am I doing myself harm having such a high level of D? Should I cut the supplement to the minimum and keep the sun-exposure going? What am I talking about - I'm not stopping the sun-tingle I get now.
    I'm swamped, friends, absolutely swamped so it'll have to be brief and without references.

    It appears that 50-80 ng/ml (per labcorp or ZRT) is idea. If Quest did your test, results tend to be both inaccurate and imprecise....and not scaled to the gold standard DiaSorin process which is used in virtually all of the D studies. If Quest did your test, the best advice so far (from Cannell) is to divide the result by 1.3.

    The following is from the D doc that's linked in my sig line:

    ❍ 32 ng/mL (80 nmol/L) is the bottom of the current reference range in the US.
    This level leaves us in a state of substrate starvation which isn't good.
    And if
    Quest** did your test - see note above - you need to divide by 1.3.

    40 ng/mL (100 nmol/L) the minimum recommended by currently by
    any major D researcher (see
    grassrootshealth.net).

    50 ng/mL (125 nmol/L) is the point at which we have sufficient substrate
    for managing calcium levels and have additional to use for other necessary
    physiological functions - including gene expression (300+ other functions in our bodies)


    60-70 ng/mL (150-175 nmol/L) is the 'middle of the current reference range
    for the major US labs. European and canadian labs are behind the times on this
    one and are still generally using a much lower range that accepts truly
    deficient levels as normal.


    80 ng/mL (200 nmol/L) is the higher end of normal but still within the physiological
    range of what we could achieve from significant midday sun exposure.

    100 ng/mL (250 nmol/L) a level still obtainable by extensive sun exposure -
    think lifeguards in South Florida. That this value can be achieved only through
    sun exposure implies that this is still a physiologically appropriate level. Having
    said that, even with extreme sun exposure, it's almost impossible to get to 100ng/mL
    so it *might* be too high. Personally I'd stay around 60-70 ng/mL.

    200 ng/mL (500 nmol/L) is the lowest blood level of 25(OH)D at which there
    has been documented D toxicity. There has never been a case reported at levels
    lower than that. (but it doesn't mean that it's safe or good to exceed 80-100 ng/mL
    except in a few rare cases)



    And what do I do if the lung problems come back?
    Don't drop down to 400-800 IU per day.
    Don't get significant midday, full body sun, to the point just before a burn would occur *AND* take vitamin D. Do one or the other. Or do a portion of one and a portion of the other.

    I do get midday, bikini, summer sun to the point just before a burn would occur about twice a week (which is about 35 min each side for my fitzpatrick phototype III skin)....of course, longer exposure times are needed as one tans. Anyhoo, on the days I get that sun, I don't take D. On the days I do take my full dose, I cover meticulously (mostly because I don't want the sun damage).

    If I didn't cover meticulously, I'd take a partial dose, guestimating as well as I could.

    So tell me more about your test....lab? units?
    Last edited by cillakat; 07-14-2010 at 10:58 AM. Reason: additional info



    iherb referral code CIL457- $5 off first order


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •