Limited Time: Grab your FREE Box of Dark Chocolate Almond Bars Get Yours>>Close
Open
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?: A Response from John McDougall, MD

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    207

    Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?: A Response from John McDougall, MD

    Shop Now
    I just read this and was wondering what you guys think:

    "Starches have fueled the engines of human civilizations for at least the past 14,000 years. Carbohydrates (starches), such as rice in Asia, corn in Central America, potatoes in South America, and barley and wheat in Europe, have provided the bulk of the calories for almost all human diets. Only a few small primitive populations, living at the extremes of the environment, such as the Inuit (Eskimos), have been fueled by saturated fats. Just as undeniable, worldwide today populations of people who consume the greatest amounts of carbohydrate are the trimmest and fittest, and also have the lowest incidence of heart disease and diabetes. This truth is confirmed by observing the change that occurs when people from Japan, for example, migrate to the United States or Europe. As they eat less rice (carbohydrate) and more saturated fat (meat and dairy products) they become fatter and sicker."
    Link to full response:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-m..._b_639354.html

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    917
    The comments will be funny by this time tomorrow.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    338
    Yeah it's a lot of CW nonsense, broken logic, and rhetorical tricks. Even if we were to grant that carbs made up the bulk of calories for most human civilizations for the past 14,000 years (which they didn't), so what? 14,000 years is nothing in evolutionary terms. Maybe the comments will rip it to shreds. I'm hopeful based on the two comments posted.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    207
    Me too Can I tell you how much CW I'm trying to defend myself against?! I started working out with a trainer and told him how I was eating and he nearly lost it. He said 50% fat would make my body too acidic. It's hard to be new to this and have to try to stick to my guns but I have so much more muscle then I did 2 months ago and it stays! No more chronic cardio for me too (oh and he loved that one too

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,620
    hmmm I read something today about acidity due to meat but I cant recall what the real issue was. (memory like a sieve) I definitely like not eating copious amounts of carbs but I'm not a carbophobe like some.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,673
    Quote Originally Posted by Suse View Post
    hmmm I read something today about acidity due to meat but I cant recall what the real issue was. (memory like a sieve) I definitely like not eating copious amounts of carbs but I'm not a carbophobe like some.
    Actually I just read today that sugar may be the main culprit for acidity.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    376
    meat, dairy, and grains all promote acidity. As does sugar, alcohol, coffee and tea. Let's see...what's left? Oh yeah, fruits and veggies!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    2,059
    Fail.
    .`.><((((> .`.><((((>.`.><((((>.`.><(( ((>
    ><((((> .`.><((((>.`.><((((>.`.><(( ((>

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    4,390

    I'm finding the steak and eggs I'm having for dinner, way more compelling than McDougall's arguments.
    Meh.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    820
    Shop Now
    grain 14,000 years ago? i dont think so.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •