Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: New US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Report is out page

  1. #1
    mdlaw's Avatar
    mdlaw is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010

    New US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Report is out

    Shop Now
    The 2010 report, which I guess will form the basis for the next food pyramid is out, and I'd say it's a mixed bag, although probably an improvement.

    The good? "High-energy, non-nutrient-dense carbohydrate sources that should be reduced to aid in calorie control include sugar-sweetened beverages; desserts, including grainbased desserts; and grain products and other carbohydrate foods and drinks that are low in nutrients." p. 9.

    "Animal sources of protein, including meat, poultry, seafood, milk, and eggs, are the highest quality proteins." p. 8-9.

    The bad? "[I]ndividuals should first aim to consume less than 10 percent of energy as saturated fats and gradually reduce intake over time, while increasing polyunsaturated and monounsaturated sources." p. 8.

    The ugly? "[S]tarchy vegetables remain part of the vegetable group in the USDA Food Patterns." p. 34.

    "Indeed, observational data generally report that higher carbohydrate intake is linked to lower body weight." p. 414.

    The whole thing is 700 pages long, so I haven't delved too deeply into it, but I wonder if it's a tiny change in the right direction. We shall see.
    Last edited by mdlaw; 07-01-2010 at 07:58 AM.

  2. #2
    Stabby's Avatar
    Stabby is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Lacks pig skin gelatin, shredded cow brain, and oxen testicles.
    Stabbing conventional wisdom in its face.

    Anyone who wants to talk nutrition should PM me!

  3. #3
    JasonBanz's Avatar
    JasonBanz is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Hagerstown, MD
    I think the US in US Dietary guidelines stands for unbelievabley stupid!
    Insert whitty diet remark here!

  4. #4
    Russ's Avatar
    Russ is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Central Florida
    The governments midas touch of stupidity and fail strikes again

  5. #5
    Eklecktika's Avatar
    Eklecktika is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Clarkston, WA
    Can you imagine the backlash, though, if they did a 180 on PUFA's and grains? Actually admit they were wrong?
    Chief cook & bottle washer for one kid, a dog, 6 hens, 2 surprise! roosters, two horses, and a random 'herd' of quail.

    ~The ultimate ignorance is the rejection of something one knows nothing about and refuses to investigate~

  6. #6
    lmyers04's Avatar
    lmyers04 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Austin, Texas
    Nestle and Kraft are safe!

  7. #7
    hw1178's Avatar
    hw1178 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Shop Now
    What really bothers me is that most of their whole grain studies are done with the purpose of comparing diets high in whole grains vs diets low in whole grain, but high in refined grains. They don't site any studies that ditch the grains all-together.

    It just seems so stupid. Of course whole grains are better than refined grains, but are they better than no grains at all? They didn't bother to check up on that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts