I am female. I can cut a ton of calories and not lose, but I can also eat a ton and not gain. I think the body down and up regulates metabolism based on amount of food to an extent. I am not saying calories do not matter at all, but I don't believe a straight CICO-weightloss correlation.
HCLF: lean red meat, eggs, low-fat dairy, bone broth/gelatin, fruits, seafood, liver, small amount of starch (oatmeal, white rice, potatoes, carrots), small amount of saturated fat (butter/ghee/coconut/dark chocolate/cheese).
My Journal: gelatin experiments, vanity pictures, law school rants, recipe links
Food blog: GELATIN and BONE BROTH recipes
" The best things in life are free and the 2nd best are expensive!" - Coco Chanel
Also women get the vapors.
Sent via F-22 Raptor
For me it works on the ratios
I am 5 ft 1 and 122 lbs and 58
Only exercise is walking 6+ k/ day
To maintain the above I can eat about 1400 cals BUT only if the carbs are below 100 g doesn't matter how many cals if that carb figure goes above 150 g I will put on weight.....
Some of you may die, but that is a risk I'm willing to take.
Now that I think of it my "maintenance level" is much like others have responded.... vast. I can way overeat or even undereat and remain where I am. I'm about 15% bf by calipers though, so I'm cool with that. Sure I can fluctuate 5-10lbs in a week (or more like this past weekend), but I always settle back to this weight as long as I'm eating 80% primal.
Last edited by Neckhammer; 09-06-2013 at 11:08 AM.
Don't try to understand women. Only women understand women.
That is why they hate each other.
"The soul that does not attempt flight; does not notice its chains."
I've been eating the same 1200-1400 calories for many years. It was only when I replaced carb calories with fat/protein calories that I saw a difference in weight.
5'0" female, 45 years old. Started Primal October 31, 2011, at a skinny fat 111.5 lbs. Low weight: 99.5 lb on a fast. Gained back to 115(!) on SAD chocolate, potato chips, and stress. Currently 111.