Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NY Times Article Today - Sat Fat Bad for Aging

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Thanks for the references, Griff. I'll look to build more of a foundation under this whole PB venture. And thanks to all for the discussion! This was my first spin on the forums and it's been good.

    Comment


    • #17
      No problem, Dave - hope that it helps!
      Primal eating in a nutshell: If you are hungry, eat Primal food until you are satisfied (not stuffed). Then stop. Wait until you're hungry again. Repeat.

      Looking for my Cholesterol Primer? Here it is: http://www.marksdailyapple.com/forum...mer-(Attempt-2)


      Ditch the scale!: http://www.marksdailyapple.com/forum/thread33283.html

      My Success Story: http://www.marksdailyapple.com/forum/thread30615.html

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Dave View Post
        Again, folks, look at the tables: http://archneur.ama-assn.org/cgi/data/2010.84/DC1/1

        Yes, they did account for the other foods that were consumed; all broken out into 30 different groups, each with their own correlation coefficient.
        Even if for the sake of argument it was conceded that the study was conducted in such a way that the data were valid, assigning a correlate to each specific food source is metabolic nonsense. The reductionist model of nutrition doesn't take into account the real underlying physiological processes and fails to account for how far a particular food might be from its natural origin and what those processes have done to the food in question. Soliciting participants to self-report on (perceived) food consumption and then rates of some condition will yield nonsense no matter what level of mathematical sophistication is applied to the data. These are lazy studies that are just too many levels of indirection away from actual knowledge to be of any use.

        Comment

        Working...
        X