Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Paleo And Politics

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I agree with the correlation, not causational factor.

    Although being Paleo has made me become more informed. Because prior, I couldn't care less about politics.
    My chocolatey Primal journey

    Unusual food recipes (plus chocolate) blog

    Comment


    • #17
      Primal/Paleo to me is a result of my increased interest in the sciences, particularly natural and evolutionary science. These same interests have pushed me in the direction of being an ultra-conservative (not the religious, fundamentalist type though, obviously). Or at least ultra-conservative in the sense that some of my views are generally beyond what most find tolerable.

      On and issue to issue basis, I probably could list things that would fall into many different categories. On economics, for example, I am not openly aggressive to programs often embraced by the left, but I don't believe them to be fundamental rights either.
      Started 9/5/11 at 212lb
      Last weigh in 12/10/11 at 188lb
      Goal: 160

      Comment


      • #18
        Primal hasn't really changed my politics. I believed government was nothing but a gang of thieves and thugs before and I still believe that now. But I do think it has contributed to me becoming a bit more politically engaged. Whereas before I saw government as something to avoid and ignore, I'm finding myself more inclined to engage and resist now. Maybe it is just a phase, totally unrelated to Primal, I don't know. But this past year I changed my voter registration so I could vote for the only Pale-Friendly presidential candidate in the primaries. I try to support agorist businesses whenever I can. This weekend I was able to tip off some guys by the beach selling coconuts that the Code Enforcers were making their way up to their impromptu "stand" and they were able to pack everything up and avoid getting pinched. That made me feel real good.
        My Recipes are at: www.southbeachprimal.com

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by cobalamin View Post
          Since when did the government have the corporations on a leash?
          Could somebody, please?! Nobody in government is smart enough to screw us the way Monsanto and ConAgra can. Just because the lackeys in government are sucking the corporate d!< doesn't mean they are the ones actually pulling the strings.
          50yo, 5'3"
          SW-195
          CW-125, part calorie counting, part transition to primal
          GW- Goals are no longer weight-related

          Comment


          • #20
            Paleo/primal has not effected my politics, but I have found that there seem to more libertarians amongst us than in the general population. Even a few of my friends, who I was already friends with because of shared politics (or anther interest - but also happen to have shared politics with), I found out are paleo too.

            I was libertarian before, but it's quite possible that my personality (and political beliefs) made it easier for me to discard the government's idea of a good diet (influenced largely by politics, rather than science, and the heavily subsidized grain industry) given the distrust I already had in their ideas of what's good/right for my life.
            Healthy Bucket List:
            • Summit all of Colorado's 14-ers
            • Hike the Appalachian Trail
            • Do a real pull-up
            • Run a 5k
            • Be "Hot For Training Camp"



            Check out my journey at Outdoor Amy's Blog.

            Comment


            • #21
              I think it's kind of a mutual leash. Corporations pay politicians to pass laws that further their agenda and politicians hold their legislative power over corporations for pay. All you have to do is look at the revolving door between Monsanto and the Fed'l governing agencies (FDA, USDA, etc.) to see that it's collusion to screw the consumer. Parasites gone wild.

              It's funny how a product can be labelled "non-fat" even though there isn't any proof that fat is unhealthy, but it can't be labelled "non-GMO" even though we have no idea what GMO products are going to do to us ten to fifty years down the line. If I knew nothing else about the relationship between BigFood and the Fed, I'd know how corruption worked.
              "Right is right, even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong, even if everyone is doing it." - St. Augustine

              B*tch-lite

              Who says back fat is a bad thing? Maybe on a hairy guy at the beach, but not on a crab.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by LauraSB View Post
                Could somebody, please?! Nobody in government is smart enough to screw us the way Monsanto and ConAgra can. Just because the lackeys in government are sucking the corporate d!< doesn't mean they are the ones actually pulling the strings.
                Large corporations would not exist but for a powerful regulatory state. The two go hand in hand, feed off each other, and there is often a revolving door between government posts and top corporate jobs- especially in the most highly regulated industries such as finance and food. People in government are not smart, no, but they don't have to be smart to be dangerous. I doubt President Obama read a single line of the horrific Food Safety and Modernization Act he just signed, and wouldn't have been able to make heads or tails of it even if he had. But that bill, passed on by a bunch of equally unqualified clueless nitwits in the House and Senate to reach his desk, is nonetheless the law of the land. Power need not be "smart" to screw us, it only needs to be powerful.
                My Recipes are at: www.southbeachprimal.com

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by OutdoorAmy View Post
                  Paleo/primal has not effected my politics, but I have found that there seem to more libertarians amongst us than in the general population. Even a few of my friends, who I was already friends with because of shared politics (or anther interest - but also happen to have shared politics with), I found out are paleo too.

                  I was libertarian before, but it's quite possible that my personality (and political beliefs) made it easier for me to discard the government's idea of a good diet (influenced largely by politics, rather than science, and the heavily subsidized grain industry) given the distrust I already had in their ideas of what's good/right for my life.
                  This has been my experience too. It's funny how paleo seems to attract libertarians the way veganism attracts liberals.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Kata View Post
                    This has been my experience too. It's funny how paleo seems to attract libertarians the way veganism attracts liberals.
                    I’m weird in the sense that I have always viewed paleo/primal as being somewhat academic, putting my health on the line to validate scientific concepts that are notoriously under researched and seldom understood.

                    But politically, it seems to make sense that libertarians would flock to paleo due to their extreme anti-governmental views. Similar to the fact that I haven’t noticed too many religious people here, who probably stopped reading when the word evolution came up.
                    Started 9/5/11 at 212lb
                    Last weigh in 12/10/11 at 188lb
                    Goal: 160

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by SouthBeachPrimal View Post
                      People in government are not smart, no, but they don't have to be smart to be dangerous.
                      Smart enough to get thousands/millions of people to vote for them. It makes me wonder who the idiots are here.

                      It seems they have perfected a way to get wealthy and powerful with minimal effort, while setting themselves up for large pensions and corporate positions/lobbying gigs after they leave office. Meanwhile I work 50 hours a week for the privledge of supporting them (and others) in the lifestyle to which they have become accustomed. Looks like they are a damned sight smarter than I am, even if not even partially as ethical.

                      As for my politics, well, I was a cynical sonofab!tch before and am now. I think I have a better chance of riding a unicorn than finding an honest politician. I am far more aware of food issues though, whether they be GMOs, organics, recalls, or the like.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by saturnfan View Post
                        I’m weird in the sense that I have always viewed paleo/primal as being somewhat academic, putting my health on the line to validate scientific concepts that are notoriously under researched and seldom understood.

                        But politically, it seems to make sense that libertarians would flock to paleo due to their extreme anti-governmental views. Similar to the fact that I haven’t noticed too many religious people here, who probably stopped reading when the word evolution came up.
                        Not so weird as you think - since I think many libertarians become libertarians because they are big thinkers - and that thinking lead them to investigate the way our lives are being run and to subsequently discard big government.

                        But there are probably more religious people within the community than you think. I've found many paleo recipes through the homemaking blogs I follow (which include a lot of religious ladies, conservative religious ladies at that) . . . I'm a religious person myself. Believing in science doesn't mean I have to discard God, science, in my opinion, doesn't explain him away, just helps us better understand how he works. In the end, whether you believe it's the food you were designed to eat, evolved to eat or both - the results are the same.

                        Speaking of which - Stossel has two episodes that cover both topics quite well with a libertarian slant - one on food politics and one on religion vs. science - both very worth watching! (And I think still free on Hulu)
                        Healthy Bucket List:
                        • Summit all of Colorado's 14-ers
                        • Hike the Appalachian Trail
                        • Do a real pull-up
                        • Run a 5k
                        • Be "Hot For Training Camp"



                        Check out my journey at Outdoor Amy's Blog.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Ya'll should read Throw Them All Out If you want to dig deeper into the interplay of political legislation, the legislators, and big business.

                          Here's an interview with the author

                          Would I be putting a grain-feed cow on a fad diet if I took it out of the feedlot and put it on pasture eating the grass nature intended?

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by OutdoorAmy View Post
                            Not so weird as you think - since I think many libertarians become libertarians because they are big thinkers
                            I've seen little evidence of this "big thinking". Libertarianism largely stole its precepts and rhetoric from anarchism, stripped away the Marxism and re-purposed it to quash democracy.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Rojo View Post
                              I've seen little evidence of this "big thinking". Libertarianism largely stole its precepts and rhetoric from anarchism, stripped away the Marxism and re-purposed it to quash democracy.
                              Stalin would approve
                              Starting Date: Dec 18, 2010
                              Starting Weight: 294 pounds
                              Current Weight: 235 pounds
                              Goal Weight: 195 pounds

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Rojo View Post
                                Libertarianism largely stole its precepts and rhetoric from anarchism, stripped away the Marxism and re-purposed it to quash democracy.
                                Huh? Do you know what anarchism is? Or maybe I don't. I don't get how one can strip Marxism from a philosphy that doesn't recognize any government authority.
                                "Right is right, even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong, even if everyone is doing it." - St. Augustine

                                B*tch-lite

                                Who says back fat is a bad thing? Maybe on a hairy guy at the beach, but not on a crab.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X