Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

There's a certain irony in this one ...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • There's a certain irony in this one ...

    Another effect of blue-light. There's a certain amusement to this one.

    ... internet pron users [hunched] over computers ... use massive artificial light to view their porn [with the result] that with time they develop erectile dysfunction and destroy GnRH and testosterone levels.
    Why are ladies and Men different with respect to their abilities to lose weight? - Page 2

  • #2
    Originally posted by Lewis View Post
    Another effect of blue-light. There's a certain amusement to this one.



    Why are ladies and Men different with respect to their abilities to lose weight? - Page 2
    Who titled that thread "Ladies and Men"?

    It's Ladies and Gentlemen OR Women and Men.
    Female, age 51, 5' 9"
    SW - 183 (Jan 22, 2012), CW - 159, GW - healthy.

    Met my 2012 goals by losing 24 pounds.
    2013 goals are to get fit and strong!

    Comment


    • #3
      Can someone interpret this please? It's from the same thread, Lewis.

      Why are ladies and Men different with respect to their abilities to lose weight? - Page 2

      "The reward of food in my opinion is not coded for in food.......it is coded for in the light levels that this food is able to grow in because that is a more stable variable over evolutionary time scales. Many foods come and go as life evolves and I do not believe the mammalian system would use a food variable to follow for energy balance. Light and dark is always present consistently since the solar system formed. Evolution uses things it can count on 100% of the time. Light and dark is one of those variables."

      Is he saying that we crave certain foods because of the light levels they grow in? Whaaat??

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by bonaldgonza
        it is coded for in the light levels that this food is able to grow in because that is a more stable variable over evolutionary time scales.
        Is that supposed to be an interpretation? I can read, I just don't know what he means by that.

        Comment


        • #5
          This is why I teach what I teach. Pardon my fun.

          The reward for whom? of food, in my opinion, is passive voice (who is coding?) not coded for unconventional preposition usage in food.......it is coded for coded for what? in the light levels that this food is able to grow in wordy because that unclear pronoun reference is a more stable variable more stable variable than what? over evolutionary time scales. Many foods come and go as life evolves so food itself is one of those variables with light? and I do not believe the mammalian system would use a food variable to follow who or what is following? Unconventional verb usage. for energy balance balance of what and what?. Light and dark is always present consistently redundant since the solar system formed. Evolution Do you really want to invoke evolution since you just made the argument that systems use only consistently present variables? uses things unclear noun it can count on 100% of the time. Light and dark is one of those variables.

          Rewrite: The quality of light mammals receive and the quality of light the plants they eat receive may matter more than overall food quality for mammal dopamine balance.

          Done.


          Last edited by sarasue624; 10-21-2012, 10:47 PM.

          Comment

          Working...
          X