Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why are there homosexuals?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Score 3 here too.
    Primal=unusual

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Neckhammer View Post
      Like anything there seems to be an enviromental and a genetic component. Is there any scientific revelations to either?
      I suggest Francis Pottenger's cat experiments are of interest here -- as they are in many other respects.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Rasputina View Post
        ...but why does it need explaining?
        This is my feeling. What's the point in "explaining" either homosexuality, bisexuality or heterosexuality? It just is what it is, and in my opinion, the only point in "explaining" it would be to attempt to influence behavior in one direction or the other. In my mind, that's neither practical nor ethical.

        Just let people be happy the way they want to be happy and quit trying to explain "why" they're the same or different.
        Durp.

        Comment


        • #34
          I have no idea why I am gay. I do know that I was born gay. I remember walking home from elementary school and one of the kids saying the word lesbian. I asked what it meant. When the boy said it was 2 girls who kiss, I remember thinking "Great! They have a word for it. There must be others."

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by RitaRose View Post
            What's the point in "explaining" either homosexuality, bisexuality or heterosexuality?
            What's the point in seeking to understand any phenomenon in Nature? It's basic to human beings to ask themselves questions about the world.

            ... in my opinion, the only point in "explaining" it would be to attempt to influence behavior in one direction or the other. In my mind, that's neither practical nor ethical.
            So in your mind we are not to seek understanding in any area that is not "practical" -- so, perhaps applied science would be OK, but no to pure science. No "useless mouths" studying subjects in those impractical universities simply for the sake of the subject itself.

            Neither, it seems, must we ever seek understanding in an area that's been marked off "Ask No Questions Here" in your "ethics". But why should your "ethics" determine what anyone is or is not allowed to inquire into or study?

            Of course it was naive of the original poster to request not to be given "political" opinions.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Lewis View Post
              What's the point in seeking to understand any phenomenon in Nature? It's basic to human beings to ask themselves questions about the world.

              So in your mind we are not to seek understanding in any area that is not "practical" -- so, perhaps applied science would be OK, but no to pure science. No "useless mouths" studying subjects in those impractical universities simply for the sake of the subject itself.

              Neither, it seems, must we ever seek understanding in an area that's been marked off "Ask No Questions Here" in your "ethics". But why should your "ethics" determine what anyone is or is not allowed to inquire into or study?

              Of course it was naive of the original poster to request not to be given "political" opinions.
              If you want to spend the time and money figuring it out, then go for it.

              I personally don't see the point in it, so I won't be spending my money or time (unless they tax me and spend it) because "I just want to know because I want to know" seems like a waste of resources when there are other mysteries that could be solved that would actually help people live healthier lives. I'm not telling anyone else not to study it, just that I don't see the point and feel limited resources would be better applied elsewhere. Your money (not a government grant, which is public money) and your time? Go for it. Make yourself giddy with sheer overwhelming knowledge.

              I just feel the first priority would be researching things that we could change to make our lives better. Sexual preference doesn't seem to fit that.

              I will say that I don't think sexual preference is an "Ask No Questions" topic, I just don't agree that "why" is going to be a fruitful pursuit. If we can take care of all the other questions in practical science, then fine, knowledge for the sake of being super knowledgeable about things that don't apply to real life is a great idea.
              Durp.

              Comment


              • #37
                I think most people, if not all, are bisexual, and lean one way or the other, consciously or not.

                I've felt 1000% GAY LIKE WHOA my entire life, but maybe now as I'm approaching mama-hood years, I find men more attractive. Still couldn't see myself banging one however. *shrug*

                But if Aleks Skarsgaard showed up at my door...!!!! Actually, we'd have to fight each other for him. Wifey thinks he's a hottie too.

                Paging Dr. Bork Bork: of *course* you wouldn't enjoy a rectal exam. YOU DON'T HAVE A PROSTATE!
                Last edited by patski; 08-05-2012, 09:17 AM.
                A Post-Primal PrimalPat

                Do not allow yourself to become wrapped up in a food 'lifestyle'. That is ego, and you are not that.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by patski View Post
                  I think most people are bisexual, and lean one way or the other, consciously or not.
                  Based on what?
                  Starting Date: Dec 18, 2010
                  Starting Weight: 294 pounds
                  Current Weight: 235 pounds
                  Goal Weight: 195 pounds

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Based on the fact that sexuality isn't, pardon the pun, a straight line?

                    I think men who are overtly homophobic are suppressing some homo desires. Women are typically more open to experimentation.

                    Granted, I also don't think sexual activity denotes sexual orientation. So I'm inserting foot-into-mouth here.
                    A Post-Primal PrimalPat

                    Do not allow yourself to become wrapped up in a food 'lifestyle'. That is ego, and you are not that.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by patski View Post
                      Granted, I also don't think sexual activity denotes sexual orientation.
                      ^this. I recall reading an article with a gay porn star who said many straight men do gay porn for the money.

                      As for why there are homosexuals, well, clothes don't design themselves. Gheesh, it is simple people.

                      Seriously though, I am with Lewis, it is interesting to think about why things work as they do. It just gets stupid when people/society/whomever start assigning value to people based on their sexual orientation or other choices that do not matter for squat outside of their own bedrooms/homes.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by cori93437 View Post
                        And there is a TEST for it...
                        Kinsey Scale Test

                        Incidentally, I scored a 3... "Equally heterosexual and homosexual".
                        Fairly accurate I'd say.
                        I did not like that test. I scored a 5. Lol

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by GuineaPigQueen View Post
                          I did not like that test. I scored a 5. Lol
                          At least you got a number. I got an X.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            I'm apparently a very unusual person =D
                            Subduction leads to orogeny

                            My blog that I don't update as often as I should: http://primalclimber.blogspot.com/

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Did the Kinsey quiz.

                              I'm a very unusual person. BUAHAHAHA! But I already knew that.
                              A Post-Primal PrimalPat

                              Do not allow yourself to become wrapped up in a food 'lifestyle'. That is ego, and you are not that.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Dr. Bork Bork View Post
                                um... no. Even a rectal exam is, well... unpleasant. And they're using extra lube!
                                That's like comparing intercourse to a pap smear. Quite a different experience, in my opinion!
                                My blog: Pretty Good Paleo
                                On Twitter: @NEKLocalvore

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X