If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
In all of the universe there is only one person with your exact charateristics. Just like there is only one person with everybody else's characteristics. Effectively, your uniqueness makes you pretty average.
I don't know the context here, but taken at face value that is the Most naive statement about politics I have ever read.
Your idea of anarchism is probably people throwing bricks at banks because people who do that are labelled as anarchists by the mainstream media. By anarchist, I mean an anarcho-capitalist who respects people's property rights.
True anarchy is the only palatable option to a liberated mind. Those who insist on social insurance against the inherently tenuous and tragic nature of biological life are forever willing to accept slavery to a state in exchange for the illusion of security.
I am my own state. My truest purpose is to realize that as fully as possible in my time. Difficult, because the trade was made before my birth, and so few accept the futility of insurance.
So you suggest we have a monopoly on protection services? I thought monopolies were bad?
This is starting to feel like arguing with a creationist.
There will always be conflict when two people want the same resources. I suggest that your anarchist premise is flawed before it starts, because it provides no viable solution to this problem.
p.s. Monopolies are not inherently bad. They are bad in a free market system, but that it not the ideal system for many industries. In fact, they are the ideal solution for systems that cannot be allowed to fail (and thus should not be allowed to 'run free' on the free market).
Capitalism is a product of the state. Projecting your own preferred mode of production as something that everyone has to adopt is inherently authoritarian, whether you choose to call yourself a socialist or capitalist or whatthefuckever.
I advocate for anarchism and fail to see anything wrong with what magicmerl is saying. Believing that "the free market" will magically take care of all economic and social woes is equally as absurd as believing that socialism can do the same. The reality is that neither can, and any economic system (or lack thereof) is inevitably going to require constant vigilance. I just posit that a stateless society would be better equipped for monitoring social justice by way of cutting out the dangerous middle-man, but that requires a population of free thinkers of which we are not. As long as the vast majority of people are being trained by their parents, teachers, and priests to obey authority, statism and capitalism will never go away. Attacking the state without first attacking the social mores that feed it is like trying to get away with only lopping off one of the hydra's heads.