Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Well that's a new one (NSFW)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Well that's a new one (NSFW)

    So I was reading this thing on calories burned while "doing it".
    Let’s Talk About Sex and Calories! — DailyMuscle.com
    A few things...
    A) Why is "self improvement" more costly than "spelunking"? Something smells fishy, and it's not the bad jokes.
    B) Who else thinks they might have a marathoners heart now?
    C) Assuming these values are correct, shouldn't all 20 year olds be calorically in debt?
    D) This isb't against the rules, is it?
    In all of the universe there is only one person with your exact charateristics. Just like there is only one person with everybody else's characteristics. Effectively, your uniqueness makes you pretty average.

  • #2
    Hm...yeah, i shouldn't be overweight at all according to that... >.>;
    Down from 275 to 250!
    Werewolf Primal Living Blog - http://lycanthropology.com
    Some fact, a lot of fiction! Keep track of my progress there!

    Comment


    • #3
      If that shit was accurate i should be flippin' 110lbs and ripped :P
      I'm a paleo foodie, come check out my recipes: http://strangekitty.ca/

      Comment


      • #4
        im going to say thats why im not as fat as i could be im going to see if the wife wants to burn some calories
        i am the invisable man

        Comment


        • #5
          I would say the calories spent "doing it" are reimbursed with a CW diet. And, one would have to "do it" at least once a day if it's an intense, long-ish bout, or several times a day for shorter bouts.
          I would also say that if a person followed a primal way of eating, their libido should rise accordingly, and not "doing it" might be somewhat painful, in many departments. If a person's body is healthy, their body would feel capable to, and want to, procreate. Body doesn't know if you're wearing a "glove" or not.

          Comment


          • #6
            Well, that explains why I'm overweight...

            :foreveralone:

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by CoS View Post
              Well, that explains why I'm overweight...

              :foreveralone:
              There must be SOMETHING about, um, vigorous "self-attention".

              Comment


              • #8
                Well like any calorie burning for exercise list it doesn't account for the amount of calories a person burns doing absolutely nothing.
                Primal Chaos
                37yo 6'5"
                6-19-2011 393lbs 60" waist
                current 338lbs 49" waist
                goal 240lbs 35" waist

                Comment


                • #9
                  LOL, this is such wildly inaccurate guesswork it's hilarious. According to the article, masturbation burns more calories (100-150) than actual intercourse (50-100).

                  Intercourse: they're doing it wrong.
                  Today I will: Eat food, not poison. Plan for success, not settle for failure. Live my real life, not a virtual one. Move and grow, not sit and die.

                  My Primal Journal

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Uncephalized View Post
                    LOL, this is such wildly inaccurate guesswork it's hilarious. According to the article, masturbation burns more calories (100-150) than actual intercourse (50-100).

                    Intercourse: they're doing it wrong.
                    +1

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Kinda threw me off that the write up is from "This Mom Blogs".

                      Cue thoughts of Paula Deen with a keyboard - not good.
                      My Fitday public journal.
                      Me vs. Russian Boar, hunt is on Aug. 20th. WHAT'S MORE PRIMAL THAN THAT?!
                      Recently survived Warrior Dash, New England.
                      Game Developer, ex-Chef, long time Fatbody.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Uncephalized View Post
                        LOL, this is such wildly inaccurate guesswork it's hilarious. According to the article, masturbation burns more calories (100-150) than actual intercourse (50-100).

                        Intercourse: they're doing it wrong.
                        I dunno, they could be catholics that think the only right way is the missionary way. (AKA- Two fishing slowly asphyxiating.)
                        My Fitday public journal.
                        Me vs. Russian Boar, hunt is on Aug. 20th. WHAT'S MORE PRIMAL THAN THAT?!
                        Recently survived Warrior Dash, New England.
                        Game Developer, ex-Chef, long time Fatbody.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X