If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Sorry, the quad dominance has nothing to do with your stat. Honestly, that stat makes no sense to me if we're talking pound-for-pound. It could be true that, if you have a man and a woman with similar height, BF% and LBM%, the man can lift more. But that could have to do with a variety of factors including leg length, Q angle and the distribution of muscle.
I interpreted it as for whatever reason women's quadriceps are underused and I wondered if it had something to do with weight distribution or high heels or something like that.
It will probably be impossible to know (assuming the statistic is true) because I don't know what type of woman was compared to what type of man. Like, are we comparing a housewife to a fairly active husband who shmoozes during a game of racquetball with an important client or are we comparing two people who are both on the same level activity-wise.
Anywho. Just wondered if anyone had heard of it and was familiar enough with the musculoskeletal system to provide some scientific reasoning.