Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Full benefits of Paleo

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Full benefits of Paleo

    I was reading through some mountain biking forums and they were talking about the paleo diet. Some where indicating that even if you don't follow it strictly 100% of the time, you can still reap 90-95% of the benefits. Is this true and is there any research on this that people can link me to?
    Thanks!! Happy Monday!

  • #2
    Basically this whole website? Scroll up and click "Start Here."

    Comment


    • #3
      Read Mark's book The Primal Blueprint and also check out Robb Wolf and Whole 9 online. Tons of stuff. You have to work out your own path, as everyone is different. You'll get a thousand different opinions from the forum. Read the books, put the concepts into practice and you'll probably be very pleasantly surprised by your results.

      Comment


      • #4
        Well, if you eat to many carbs or don't eat enough fat, you will not get any benefits.

        Comment


        • #5
          It's like your job. You gotta be a full timer for 6 months or so to get full benefits. Then you're entitled to a little vacation time once in a while.
          The Champagne of Beards

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by alanwil2 View Post
            Well, if you eat to many carbs or don't eat enough fat, you will not get any benefits.
            Seriously?

            I've noticed plenty of benefits from dropping grains and crappy seed oils, which are also main points of a paleo/primal diet. Carbs come from other (perfectly healthy) sources than bread and pasta and limiting those healthy carbs can be negative for some people. Eating more fat isn't always the answer, especially when your body may not be able to absorb it properly.

            OP, even the Primal Blueprint advocates an 80/20 approach and details the many benefits of doing so.

            Comment


            • #7
              There's really no evidence paleo works, only a lot of testimonials and suggestive science. What I mean is you're presented a case of why grains are bad, or why vegetables or meat is good, but you won't find a study comparing paleo to standard American diet, for instance.
              http://lifemutt.blogspot.sg/ - Gaming, Food Reviews and Life in Singapore

              Comment


              • #8
                Why would someone do that? ConAgra would squash you.

                We can't have truth and reason overriding the nutrition of commerce.
                I find your lack of bacon disturbing.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by AMonkey View Post
                  There's really no evidence paleo works, only a lot of testimonials
                  Testimonials are data.
                  Last edited by MsSmith; 10-01-2013, 07:58 AM.
                  Paleo Diet: 8-25-13 Wt: 185 BF% 27
                  Primal Diet (Lower Fat/Carb): 9-27, Wt: 176.4
                  Potato Hack Diet (Rotation): 11-12, Wt: 171.2
                  Primal Diet (LF/C): 1-23-14, Wt: 159.6
                  1-30-2014 - 157 (lowest weight since 2004)
                  GAPS/SCD 12-29-2014
                  CW: 164 GW: 130-135 CBF%: 24.38
                  49 - 5'7.5"
                  Macros (PFC) 30/40/30

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Modern studies aren't much better than testimonials. Running proper controls and testing bloodwork in the lab on a high number of subjects is expensive. Much easier and cheaper to re-examine previous data (metastudy) or hand out surveys to a few people.
                    5'0" female, 45 years old. Started Primal October 31, 2011, at a skinny fat 111.5 lbs. Low weight: 99.5 lb on a fast. Gained back to 115(!) on SAD chocolate, potato chips, and stress. Currently 111.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by oxide View Post
                      Modern studies aren't much better than testimonials. Running proper controls and testing bloodwork in the lab on a high number of subjects is expensive. Much easier and cheaper to re-examine previous data (metastudy) or hand out surveys to a few people.
                      They are significantly better. Epidemiological data does have significant problems though.

                      Originally posted by MsSmith View Post
                      Testimonials are data.
                      There isn't any science, even social science which uses testimonials as data. You'll also find a lot more testimonials saying that crystal healing works, aliens sightings, veganism is the best for health etc than primal or paleo.
                      http://lifemutt.blogspot.sg/ - Gaming, Food Reviews and Life in Singapore

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X