Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Another disservice of the health movment - using the word "fasting"

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by AMonkey View Post
    Thats why its called 'intermittent' fasting, which is an entirely accurate term.
    So someone eating 6 times per day, abstaining from food for four hours, can also claim to be intermittent 'fasting'.

    Comment


    • #32
      You know how you take 'fasting labs'? It's like that.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by gmatt View Post
        So someone eating 6 times per day, abstaining from food for four hours, can also claim to be intermittent 'fasting'.
        The term doesn't have a quantifiable definition, so yes, somebody could claim that. Though using it in that context (4 hours of fasting) would be considered incorrect.
        http://lifemutt.blogspot.sg/ - Gaming, Food Reviews and Life in Singapore

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by AMonkey View Post
          ... so yes, somebody could claim that...
          That is why it is ridiculous. Frankly, I don't care what meaningless, marketing buzz-word is used by people. However, I'm reminded of the old saying, "Don't p*** on my foot and tell me it's raining."

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by gmatt View Post
            That is why it is ridiculous. Frankly, I don't care what meaningless, marketing buzz-word is used by people. However, I'm reminded of the old saying, "Don't p*** on my foot and tell me it's raining."
            How do you feel about the terms "paleo", "low carb" and "primal"?
            http://lifemutt.blogspot.sg/ - Gaming, Food Reviews and Life in Singapore

            Comment


            • #36
              I think it's entirely arbitrary to try to come up with a minimum number of hours before it's allowed to qualify as fasting because it surely depends on the person, their normal habits, their instincts, whether they are doing it consciously, whether it "feels" like fasting to them. I used to be heavily reliant om breakfast so for me initially just to delay breakfast felt like fasting and also like a huge triumph and a big step in my healing. I have since gone 23 hours effortlessly and my regular 16-18 hrs rarely feel like fasting to me now, but they're still fasting for someone who is needing to consciously make an effort to do that. Remember people start from very different places and it can sound rather harsh/patronising to tell someone who has made a big stride in healing their body to be able to get to 16 hrs fasting and still has to try hard to get there, that their efforts aren't good enough to be called fasting. Even in its cultural and religious usage, fasting has hugely varying meanings. I think we can allow some flexibility here! If it feels like fasting to the person doing it, then fasting it is.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by AMonkey View Post
                The term doesn't have a quantifiable definition, so yes, somebody could claim that. Though using it in that context (4 hours of fasting) would be considered incorrect.
                If it's less than 6-8 hours then it's ridiculous to even consider it fasting. Common sense dictates that the minimum period of time for a fast needs to be longer than the time you spend asleep. Otherwise nearly everybody would be fasting every day, from a technical stand point.

                Comment


                • #38
                  I am also tempted to say that a "fast" doesn't begin really until your body is done digesting whatever you ate last.

                  M.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Well, the morning meal IS called "BreakFast" after all... I guess those guys back then considered it a fast. I wonder where did the word originate from.

                    Originally posted by hedwards View Post
                    If it's less than 6-8 hours then it's ridiculous to even consider it fasting. Common sense dictates that the minimum period of time for a fast needs to be longer than the time you spend asleep. Otherwise nearly everybody would be fasting every day, from a technical stand point.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Fæstan is the Old English root of "fasting". It is from the Nordic root "Fasta", which just means to abstain.

                      M.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X