If diabetes is actually caused by thyroid issues (sodium/potassium imbalance) and an estrogen/testosterone imbalance (low saturated fat/high unsaturated fat diet) and not "sugar", then Danny's method would be very effective. The "sugar" theory for diabetes is just as old and tired as the "saturated fat/cholesterol" theory. Are we falling into the same traps as the CW crowd we rail against for "not getting it"? Can we AT LEAST distinguish that there is a difference between the sugar found in organic milk and fresh fruits versus high fructose corn syrup, wheat flour and agave syrup?
What we DO know for a fact is that due to the high toxin load in the SAD, typically the only thing keeping people's thyroids from failing is the high levels of sugar and sodium in the diet.
I'm not claiming to be an expert - I clearly am not - but a lot of you are reaming out Danny and you've clearly never even spent 5 minutes reading what he has to say. People are clearly skimming the titles of posts and stopping at the headline and drawing a conclusion versus what they think they know from Primal. That kind of thinking is dangerous and it's why we have liquid egg whites and fat free cream cheese on the shelves.