Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Saturated Fat Study Thoughts

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Saturated Fat Study Thoughts

    Can anyone more intelligent than me respond to this?

    https://plus.google.com/109926473783...ts/8cZfL4Xn77F (post from an highly influential Vegan)

    More specifically:

    http://www.cochranejournalclub.com/r...f/CD002137.pdf

  • #2
    There was no clear effect of any dietary fat intervention compared to usual or control diet on mortality
    There was no clear effect of any dietary fat intervention compared to usual diet on cardiovascular mortality
    There was a reduction in cardiovascular events for any dietary fat intervention compared with usual diet

    but it is likely that a few small studies with more cardiovascular events in the intervention groups may be missing from the review
    I could quote more, but from the author directly:
    -No stastistically significant change in heart attack/stroke/cancer/diabetes.
    -Claimed reductions in LDL(we know the limitations there)
    -the "modified fat"(more mono/polyunsaturated) had lower triglycerides. Again, we know lower-carb/animal-heavy diets can do as well or better here.
    -generally doesn't effect blood pressure

    Basically, there's a correlated reduction in "cardiovascular events", and that's about it - overall mortality is unchanged, and for everything else the confidence intervals include the 0/1.0 point, meaning that there's a significant chance there was no meaningful(or the opposite) effect.

    And the bottom line is that the study ONLY looks at two things: relative fraction of calories from fat, and (loosely) fat breakdown - emphasis on unsaturated fats. The problems with this:

    -Doesn't separate monounsaturated from polyunsaturated, and certainly ignores n-3 to n-6 ratios (confounding factors)
    -While it ostensibly looks at fat calories versus carbohydrate calories, carbohydrate quality is not discussed

    Basically it shows that there may be some slight, situational risk reduction as a result of reducing fat intake, but it does nothing to establish any greater level of detail - was it really saturated fats? How did total PUFA's change? What kind of carbohydrates was the population consuming? It certainly didn't show a mammoth, colossal shift in health/mortality outcomes.

    Comment


    • #3
      Wow - what a thorough answer. Thanks! I bow down to you. I may well cut-and-paste your response, Leo's vegan stance gets on my nerves...

      Comment


      • #4
        The data on the relationship between saturated fat and heart disease are notoriously scant for women. Much of the research on diet seems to be centered around, and tailored towards male heart disease pts., and then that prescriptive diet has been extrapolated to everyone. The data are scant everywhere, from Ancel Keys all the way up to now. What we do know is that when LC/HSATFAT weight reduction diets are compared with LF/HC diets, the one with all that nasty SATFAT always wins. Weight loss is oftentimes a wash, but the improvement in lipid risk factors is incredibly clear and repeatable.
        IMO, the story is still out for people who eat SATFAT with carbs. I think many of the young, slender (mostly male) paleo/primals who eat satfat and have started eating lots of carbs are playing russian roulette.
        Leo's vegan stance is a outgrowth (dare I say cancer???) of his minimalist views. However, paleo (and not as much primal) living is really the simplest and most ecological of all, if it is really based on grass-fed/wild meats. Eating all plants is efficient only where there is fabulous soil, weather and rainfall. Any place where you have a deficit in any of these means you are relying on plenty of outside inputs and complications in order to do intensive agriculture, and a pastoral or wild animal way is more efficient. Dry-land farming is efficient, too, but we don't rely on many food crops within such a system, just grass for the animals and maybe things like cotton.
        Last edited by Paleobirdy; 11-11-2011, 06:38 PM. Reason: added an H

        Comment


        • #5
          Man, I just love the minds on these boards.

          Beautiful, beautiful things.
          Durp.

          Comment


          • #6
            2. The evidence isn't conclusive yet, but the best analysis of what we have so far indicates that replacing saturated fats with unsaturated fats reduces the risk of heart disease.

            3. Replacing saturated fats with carbohydrates (low-fat diets) is inconclusive so far.

            4. There is no good evidence to indicate that eating lots of saturated fats is healthy for your heart, regardless of the source of those saturated fats.



            From the research I have done these appear to be true, but it seems like replacing saturated fats with carbs has shown bad results while replacing saturated fats with pufas (vegetable oils and the like) has shown good results.

            Comment


            • #7
              From a post a little bit down by leo:

              The definitive statement is: based on the evidence we have so far, it's best to reduce saturated fat intake and replace it with unsaturated fats (not carbs).

              From the research I have done this seems to be true.

              Comment


              • #8
                Throw medium-chain triglycerides into this. All I eat for breakfast every day is a can of coconut milk. 765 calories, most of it saturated medium-chain triglyceride fat. I then go about four hours before digging into my sweet potatoes and apple, avocado and mackerel. Seems like that's long enough to prevent the storage, right?
                Crohn's, doing SCD

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Knifegill View Post
                  Throw medium-chain triglycerides into this. All I eat for breakfast every day is a can of coconut milk. 765 calories, most of it saturated medium-chain triglyceride fat. I then go about four hours before digging into my sweet potatoes and apple, avocado and mackerel. Seems like that's long enough to prevent the storage, right?
                  MCT's and other classifications of saturated fats is another interesting topic that almost never gets discussed. We draw distinctions between monounsaturated fats, and n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fats, but what about the different types of saturated fats? It's entirely possible that some of them are harmless or healthy, while others are quite bad. I've never seen any real research targeted at drawing any distinctions in this respect.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by jimhensen View Post
                    2. The evidence isn't conclusive yet, but the best analysis of what we have so far indicates that replacing saturated fats with unsaturated fats reduces the risk of heart disease.

                    3. Replacing saturated fats with carbohydrates (low-fat diets) is inconclusive so far.

                    4. There is no good evidence to indicate that eating lots of saturated fats is healthy for your heart, regardless of the source of those saturated fats.



                    From the research I have done these appear to be true, but it seems like replacing saturated fats with carbs has shown bad results while replacing saturated fats with pufas (vegetable oils and the like) has shown good results.
                    What research are you referring to? I thought there was a new study showing that adding in the carbs wasn't good, but don't remember the satfat-with-pufa part.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      This isn't a study, it is a review of previous studies. I don't have links to the studies but there are a few that have shown that replacing saturated fats with omegas (usually omega 6's) seems to reduce heart attack.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by PrimalMark
                        Like Robb Wolfe said recently 'dont waste your time with people that aint serious'. Why waste time convincing vegans about stuff they dont want to do. Vegans are a bunch of skinny posers that pretend they care about animal rights but they really only eat vegan to fit into their skinny pants lol!

                        Im living proof that a diet rich in Saturated fat is heart healthy. Ive been eating high fat all my life and since going Primal 6 years ago have increased my fat intake but just make sure its quality saturated fat from beef, coconut etc.

                        If fat was gonna kill ya, Id be dead vs a walking hulk of strength and testosterone.
                        I'm so glad that after being primal for 6 years you've finally decided to share your expertise with the community.
                        If you're interested in my (very) occasional updates on how I'm working out and what I'm eating click here.

                        Originally posted by tfarny
                        If you are new to the PB - please ignore ALL of this stuff, until you've read the book, or at least http://www.marksdailyapple.com/primal-blueprint-101/

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X