Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

nuts omega 6/3 ratio

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • nuts omega 6/3 ratio

    I know a lot of nuts have a bad 6/3 ratio, but which ones are the best?

  • #2
    Macademias are the only best.
    .`.><((((> .`.><((((>.`.><((((>.`.><(( ((>
    ><((((> .`.><((((>.`.><((((>.`.><(( ((>

    Comment


    • #3
      Even then, our bodies aren't very efficient at converting the short-chain n-3s into long-chain n-3s, the ones we need. Check out this chart for a good graphical analysis of n-3 vs n-6 in foods.
      Lean, Mean, Virile Machine
      The Modern Man's Guide to Health, Fitness, and Wellness

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Darrin View Post
        Even then, our bodies aren't very efficient at converting the short-chain n-3s into long-chain n-3s, the ones we need. Check out this chart for a good graphical analysis of n-3 vs n-6 in foods.
        Whoa... that bit about the grass fed beef and Omega ratios is interesting. I seem to recall hearing that once. That must be why PB recommends Organic beef over just grass fed.

        "Another thing I learned doing this - When it comes to omega-3 content, there's hardly a difference between grass-fed beef and conventional beef. And neither of them provide more than a few milligrams in the raw state, probably negligible amounts after being cooked."

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by barryman9000 View Post
          Whoa... that bit about the grass fed beef and Omega ratios is interesting. I seem to recall hearing that once. That must be why PB recommends Organic beef over just grass fed.

          "Another thing I learned doing this - When it comes to omega-3 content, there's hardly a difference between grass-fed beef and conventional beef. And neither of them provide more than a few milligrams in the raw state, probably negligible amounts after being cooked."
          First part of that is bullshit, however I do agree with the second part. Beef has so little PUFA's that it's not a significant source of O3. Better save that grass-fed money for some fish oil if that's what you're after.
          .`.><((((> .`.><((((>.`.><((((>.`.><(( ((>
          ><((((> .`.><((((>.`.><((((>.`.><(( ((>

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Darrin View Post
            Even then, our bodies aren't very efficient at converting the short-chain n-3s into long-chain n-3s, the ones we need. Check out this chart for a good graphical analysis of n-3 vs n-6 in foods.
            So even if a non fish food source has a good omega balance it doesn't really matter? Should we just be trying to eat foods lowest in Omega 6 and not worry about the ratio?

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't think ratio is very important. What's more important is eating foods low in PUFA's (regardless of ratio) and filling the blanks with omega 3's from fish oil. Walnuts have a decent ratio, but just look at how much PUFA a single oz has!!
              .`.><((((> .`.><((((>.`.><((((>.`.><(( ((>
              ><((((> .`.><((((>.`.><((((>.`.><(( ((>

              Comment


              • #8
                Maybe it's the other way around.

                Omega 6 is an essential fat that we need and cannot produce so we must get it through diet for optimal health. It is a little too easy to get, but we still need it.
                If we are following primal principles avoiding refined oils and adding lots of Omega 3, I don't think ratios need to be monitored.
                Eat more fish. Maybe eat less poultry and pork.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by rphlslv View Post
                  "Another thing I learned doing this - When it comes to omega-3 content, there's hardly a difference between grass-fed beef and conventional beef. And neither of them provide more than a few milligrams in the raw state, probably negligible amounts after being cooked."

                  First part of that is bullshit, however I do agree with the second part. Beef has so little PUFA's that it's not a significant source of O3. Better save that grass-fed money for some fish oil if that's what you're after.
                  So you're saying there is a big difference in omega-3 content when comparing grass-fed beef to feed lot beef?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X