Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is "Getting Ripped" Even Healthy?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by oxide View Post
    geeezoos, ppl.

    There's more to life than a goddam six-pack. If you're there without much effort, fine. If you turn into an obsessive hermit to get a six pack, then your mental state is going to cause you far more damage than 5-6 pounds of fat. Work on your friendships instead.
    Nothing worth having comes without much effort.

    I'm not sure how you can come to the conclusion that putting forth a lot of effort to achieve a great physique and good health is in any way harmful to one's mental state. I would argue the opposite.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by oxide View Post
      geeezoos, ppl.

      There's more to life than a goddam six-pack. If you're there without much effort, fine. If you turn into an obsessive hermit to get a six pack, then your mental state is going to cause you far more damage than 5-6 pounds of fat. Work on your friendships instead.
      People can be motivated of getting rid of their bodyfat for other reasons than seeing their own six-pack! Personally I have more of an eight pack right now, but that’s not the point at all! My last effort helped me to get rid of 10 pound of fat and the “feel-good” effect is very notable, since my heart doesn’t have to pump oxygen to all that inactive fat tissue. Moving around is more funny; sprints, pull-ups etc. feels much more easy, it’s like getting an extra sixth gear to my race car...
      "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

      - Schopenhauer

      Comment


      • #48
        Since I'm guessing that most people who post here are in cultures with abundant and various foods available all year, it seems that a low body fat would be okay (barring the ceasing of menses in women trying to get pregnant). But I think if we had to rely on climate and hunting for our food, it would make more sense to for our bodies to vary. We would get slightly fatter when food was plentiful, and lean out when food sources were less. Not so fat that we couldn't hunt, just enough so that we could get through times of natural food scarcity.

        That said, I don't only read M&F for the articles.
        "Right is right, even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong, even if everyone is doing it." - St. Augustine

        B*tch-lite

        Who says back fat is a bad thing? Maybe on a hairy guy at the beach, but not on a crab.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Gorbag View Post
          Good to hear sbhikes, Martin Berkhan, the Leangain guy, used to work as a model though, does he come under your definition of a "fitness model type"?

          Martin seem to be almost too lean on this photo, so I hope his mind is still intact...
          Holy cow. I had never seen a pic of his legs. Just above the waist. I think it looks kinda weird.... but at the same time, I almost want to have a similar look. I am nowhere near as lean, and don't have as much muscle, so it's not going to happen any time soon.

          Comment


          • #50
            I think just looking like a normal man is good enough. Look at aboriginals living in the wild. There's some definition but it's not all crazy huge. If that's what you want, fine, but seriously, it's not necessary for health or for getting laid.
            Female, 5'3", 50, Max squat: 202.5lbs. Max deadlift: 225 x 3.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by sbhikes View Post
              I think just looking like a normal man is good enough. Look at aboriginals living in the wild. There's some definition but it's not all crazy huge. If that's what you want, fine, but seriously, it's not necessary for health or for getting laid.
              What is "normal" for some people is not normal for others. Are these aboriginales "normal" for you?

              Yano183.jpg
              "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

              - Schopenhauer

              Comment


              • #52
                lifting stresses me out, it's boring, and serves no functional purpose in my lifestyle. I don't mind being really thin, I look nice in clothes.
                Make America Great Again

                Comment


                • #53
                  Is having a better chance of living through the next 20 years a functional purpose?

                  Association between muscular strength and mortality in men: prospective cohort study | BMJ

                  All cause mortality shown to be inversely proportional to strength during the 20 years these 9000 adult men were followed. Lots of other studies especially in the elderly correlating morbidity (things that make life less pleasant/make you less able to function) with less muscle/muscle atrophy. It's much easier to get stronger the younger you are. I'd call giving yourself the ability to live a longer, more productive, higher quality life about the most functional purpose there is.

                  Read this too:
                  Barbell training is big medicine

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Being strong and fit and being "ripped" aren't the same thing. You can reap the benefits of strength training without getting down to an ultra-low bodyfat percentage. A lot of people wouldn't refer to a man in the 12-15% range as ripped, but that's a perfectly healthy level of fat and one many women find attractive.

                    If someone wants to get down to a very low body fat percentage for looks, that's fine, they have the right to make that choice for their body and some people can do it in a healthy way. But for health, there's no *need* for a man to push below 10% or for a woman to push below 20%, and the extremes some people may go to in getting ultra-lean may be detrimental to their long-term health (extreme dieting, the effects on women of amenorrhea, the use of certain drugs, disordered eating, etc.). Of course not everyone will go to those extremes, and some can get there very easily and naturally, but others end up doing themselves a lot of harm in search of "ripped".

                    To be honest, I'd quite happily drop a little more fat to get to 17-18% from my current 20%. But I don't think I will make any health gains by doing so. I'm already lifting heavy and could continue to do so and benefit from it without the dietary push I would need to lose a couple more percentage points off my body fat.
                    “If I didn't define myself for myself, I would be crunched into other people's fantasies for me and eaten alive.” --Audre Lorde

                    Owly's Journal

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      I don't look too far off from those aboriginals, actually. What if that's what a woman is supposed to look like?

                      Here are some men. They look fine to me. Ripped? No.

                      Female, 5'3", 50, Max squat: 202.5lbs. Max deadlift: 225 x 3.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by sbhikes View Post
                        I don't look too far off from those aboriginals, actually. What if that's what a woman is supposed to look like?
                        "Supposed to look like"? Who makes the rules of what a woman(or man) "is supposed to look like"? God? Society?, Nature?, your mother in law? The very good thing is that we now can look the way we like and with a little "know-how" of diets and exercise, and some willpower, we can "design" and transform our own bodies the way we like, without asking anybody about what we are “supposed to look like”.
                        Originally posted by sbhikes View Post

                        Here are some men. They look fine to me. Ripped? No.
                        They may look fine to you sbhikes, and if you want to look like an aboriginal, then go for that! On the other hand, people that want to be “ripped” can shoot for that instead!

                        Personally I am not very fond of the ripped look below 5 % bodyfat, but this guy at 6 -7 % bodyfat, not ripped though, have a more healthy and esthetical look than your aboriginals in my opinion, but that's just me:

                        steve%u00252Breeves.jpg
                        "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

                        - Schopenhauer

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          I thought that Martin B pic was pretty gross and alien-looking. It's like a freak show thing. Look to athletes for your "ideal" not models of any type - sometimes they have a 6 pack but often not. They pretty much never look like Martin's pic. And posing in a thong and baby oil is not a sport.

                          edit: Yes I realize the irony of my post + my avatar.
                          Last edited by tfarny; 12-15-2012, 11:08 PM.
                          If you are new to the PB - please ignore ALL of this stuff, until you've read the book, or at least http://www.marksdailyapple.com/primal-blueprint-101/ and this (personal fave): http://www.archevore.com/get-started/

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Oh, and yes to the fact that real HGs are pretty lean but not "jacked" and show quite a bit of variation. Lots of older HGs have a bit of a pot belly too.
                            If you are new to the PB - please ignore ALL of this stuff, until you've read the book, or at least http://www.marksdailyapple.com/primal-blueprint-101/ and this (personal fave): http://www.archevore.com/get-started/

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Depends on your age, gender and ethnicity.

                              For example, few Slavic men will ever have a low-enough body-fat-% to have more than a "fourpack". Few East Asian men (of the sub-race that's shorter, with a rounder body; I don't know what it's called but I hate it when people pretend there's no variety in the Asian race) will get particularly "bulky". Young teens having a sixpack is kinda normal. Older men having a bit more fat under the belly-button and inside the thighs is normal too. Women will always need more fat than men and usually develop stronger leg muscles with greater ease, but men will get sixpacks more comfortably.

                              It's nature. Some people probably WOULD get sixpacks naturally. Think of the depictions of Amerindians from when Westerners first arrived: lean, muscular, hello sixpack! Russian strength-trainers, even on Paleo-type diets, almost ALWAYS have that little bit of extra fat at the belly. Mediterranid Whites are ridiculously skinny when young. None look less healthy than the others. They're just made differently. Were the Amerindian to put on fat, the Slav to diet until he had a sixpack or the Mediterranid to eat until he got fatter, none would look very natural or healthy.

                              Eat well, do exercise and, as long as you FEEL good, don't worry whether you're "ripped" or not: your biology will make you however you need to be and your natural shape will be FAR sexier than anything else would look on you.
                              Last edited by Kochin; 12-16-2012, 06:38 AM.
                              --
                              Perfection is entirely individual. Any philosophy or pursuit that encourages individuality has merit in that it frees people. Any that encourages shackles only has merit in that it shows you how wrong and desperate the human mind can get in its pursuit of truth.

                              --
                              I get blunter and more narcissistic by the day.
                              I'd apologize, but...

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Also, on body fat % and women:
                                A woman at 80kg with 16kg of fat is at 20% body fat.
                                A woman at 100kg with 16kg of fat is at 16% body fat.
                                A woman at 100kg with 20kg of fat is at 20% body fat.

                                If a woman is particularly muscular or heavy boned (as Slavic women, women with "simian" bodies and a lot of Black and Aboriginal women are), her body-fat-% can be lower than a skinnier women, without causing adverse effects. With the 100kg woman, 16% body fat is most likely healthier than 20%. With the 80kg woman, going to 16% would mean having only 12kg of total fat, which could be dangerous for a woman her size.

                                Or, summed up: body-fat-% and its effects are relative to lean mass and total weight.

                                (Yes, I know they're high numbers for a woman, but I needed easy numbers to work with, without going into decimals and stuff like that, as I'm bad with numbers! So, yeah, both the women in question are large for a woman, but it's more to make the point.)
                                Last edited by Kochin; 12-16-2012, 06:51 AM.
                                --
                                Perfection is entirely individual. Any philosophy or pursuit that encourages individuality has merit in that it frees people. Any that encourages shackles only has merit in that it shows you how wrong and desperate the human mind can get in its pursuit of truth.

                                --
                                I get blunter and more narcissistic by the day.
                                I'd apologize, but...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X