Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Primal Birth Control

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by PixieKitten View Post
    Though, if the dude is careful, the pull-out method is very effective. =D
    lol
    beautiful
    yeah you are

    Baby if you time travel back far enough you can avoid that work because the dust won't be there. You're too pretty to be working that hard.
    lol

    Comment


    • #17
      i'm heading into the copper wire myself. we know we don't want any more children, and i'm not interested in condoms anymore.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by zoebird View Post
        i'm heading into the copper wire myself. we know we don't want any more children, and i'm not interested in condoms anymore.

        That is probably what I'm going to get when we decide enough is enough. I am pregnant right now and if it's a boy, I'll likely get an IUD (copper). Female ob/gyns are huge supporters of them and get them for themselves very often. In fact, they feel like they are underutilized. There is always a chance of a side effect or complication, but they are pretty good.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Cin View Post
          OK, everyone here questions modern food manufacturing and Big Pharma, but are all on board with hormonal and artificial BC. Craziness!

          There is absolutely NO reason to ever take a Pill or use a condom for birth control. Your body tells you when it's fertile -- no thermometers, no pills, no IUDs, no cancer-causing fake estrogen.

          Billings Method

          I've used the Billings Method 11 years. I have four planned children. I always know when I'm fertile, full stop.

          Check it out!
          +1
          Almost any woman can use this and when you get into it it's really easy and more safe than a condom. And the cherry on top is that you get to know your body even better!

          Comment


          • #20
            I'm on the nuvaring and ever since i went primal i have lost weight quickly and my periods are insane now. I am not pregnant, infact i'm bleeding more than ever. however, I didnt have the same sugar crazings, and i felt energized enough to be social at the end of the work day, instead of napping or sitting on the couch as i typically did.
            Try the diet for a while and see what it does for your body. I'm considering gtting off of birthcontrol and doing condoms/ovulation calandar stuff to reduce my risks.

            Comment


            • #21
              VASECTOMY.

              Takes 15 minutes, a few days off and taking easy and about 2 weeks later you are good to go. I guess it is pretty primal as it only uses ( how it looked to me from my angle) a scalpel, a knitting needle like thing, a wood burning tool and a small stitch on either side. Of course there is the chance it could reverse itself so you might to get tested for swimmers every so often.

              This avoids having women taking hormonal drugs, relying on condoms, or relying on the very dubious withdrawal "method".

              Comment


              • #22
                Well, umm, in actuality, if we're after any kind of stone-age replication here, there were no forms of birth control in the paleolithic era. I mean, other than abstinence, that is.

                So, enjoying the primal/paleo lifestyle for fitness and nutrition doesn't entail having to avoid helpful technologies like condoms. I personally use Naturalamb because I don't enjoy latex or polyurethane; that, and they drastically reduce the numbing effect of typical condoms. Or, stated differently, they allow for a much greater degree of sensitivity during intercourse.
                Kane's Eye View

                Primal Kane

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Kane Augustus View Post
                  Well, umm, in actuality, if we're after any kind of stone-age replication here, there were no forms of birth control in the paleolithic era. I mean, other than abstinence, that is.
                  And anal

                  I'm sure that the African tribes who apparently practiced birth spacing prior to Europeans arrived (with their schmancy treatments for common childbirth issues due to a lack of adequate maternal nutrition as a result of subsequent children being born to closely to the elder siblings), oh and catholics around the world...

                  Because apparently sodomy is less of a sin than using contraception, or is it just that they're less likely to get caught
                  If you're interested in my (very) occasional updates on how I'm working out and what I'm eating click here.

                  Originally posted by tfarny
                  If you are new to the PB - please ignore ALL of this stuff, until you've read the book, or at least http://www.marksdailyapple.com/primal-blueprint-101/

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    If you've already had kids then a copper IUD is a great option. I have *not* had kids but I recently got one, after almost ten years of HBC (yes it is possible, its just a lot more difficult which is why doctors dont like doing it or even admitting that its an option). I was crampy for a few days, and so far my periods have been heavier (been two months) but besides that its been great.

                    (Although, I will say, the reason I went on HBC in the first place was because of hormonal imbalances giving me excessive dark body hair and acne. Luckily my acne has been cleared away with primal, but I was just noticing this morning that Im getting the dark stray facial hairs again. Le sigh. Well, my unshorn cavewoman ancestors probably would be proud.)
                    "Since going primal, I've found that there are very few problems that cannot be solved with butter and/or bacon fat."

                    My amusing take on paleo-blogging: http://whatshouldwecallpaleolife.tumblr.com/

                    Are you a Primal in San Francisco, or the SF Bay Area in general? Join our facebook group!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Perfect use for the withdrawal method is nearly as good as perfect use of condoms at preventing pregnancy. I've always wondered why it is such a mocked method of birth control. My husband and I used it for 4 years when we first got together, having sex at least once a day every day, and never once had an "accident." Never got pregnant.
                      http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journ...79-407-410.pdf
                      If the male partner withdraws before ejaculation every time a couple has vaginal intercourse, about 4% of couples will become pregnant over the course of a year [2]. However, more realistic estimates of typical use indicate that about 18% of couples will become pregnant in a year using withdrawal [3]. These rates are only slightly less effective than male condoms, which have perfect- and typical-use failure rates of 2% and 17%1, respectively [3].

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        My consternation with the withdrawal method is that 1) it is theoretically possible for stray sperm to be in pre-ejaculatory fluid and 2) it is NOT effective at preventing the spread of STDs (and yes I have known people who have used withdrawal as their primary birth control even while not in a tested, monogamous relationship. Yargle.)
                        "Since going primal, I've found that there are very few problems that cannot be solved with butter and/or bacon fat."

                        My amusing take on paleo-blogging: http://whatshouldwecallpaleolife.tumblr.com/

                        Are you a Primal in San Francisco, or the SF Bay Area in general? Join our facebook group!

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Kane Augustus View Post
                          Well, umm, in actuality, if we're after any kind of stone-age replication here, there were no forms of birth control in the paleolithic era. I mean, other than abstinence, that is.
                          Call me argumentative, but I disagree with this statement. I have no doubt that women have been working to control their reproduction as long as they have been sufficiently concious to want to. I am willing to bet that a lot of the "rhythm" methods are a lot older than we might think. They would have also known about abortifacients at the very least, if not other things that would affect their fertility. Is it what we use now? No. Was it potentially dangerous? Yes. But women like sex, too- and we don't always need a little Grok out of the deal.
                          http://cattaillady.com/ My blog exploring the beginning stages of learning how to homestead. With the occasional rant.

                          Originally Posted by TheFastCat: Less is more more or less

                          And now I have an Etsy store: CattailsandCalendula

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by drssgchic View Post
                            Call me argumentative, but I disagree with this statement. I have no doubt that women have been working to control their reproduction as long as they have been sufficiently concious to want to. I am willing to bet that a lot of the "rhythm" methods are a lot older than we might think. They would have also known about abortifacients at the very least, if not other things that would affect their fertility. Is it what we use now? No. Was it potentially dangerous? Yes. But women like sex, too- and we don't always need a little Grok out of the deal.
                            You don't need to be called argumentative because you disagree. I'm quite happy with other people's disagreement with my understandings: it gives me an opportunity to learn.

                            In any case, it seems we're talking about two different things:

                            1. The available technologies to curb potential pregnancies (condoms, IUDs, injections, etc.); and
                            2. Human enjoyment of sex without the desire for pregnancy.

                            I was specifically commenting to the first issue. You rightly took up the second issue. So, when we look back in time toward the paleolithic era, you are right to say that women probably encouraged each other and their respective partners toward some kinds of rhythm methods, perhaps even coitus interruptus, and specifically for the purpose of enjoying sexual fulfillment without the result of pregnancy.

                            So, far from being argumentative, thank you for pointing these things out. Your comment helped me to clarify my original comment, which when I look back at it wasn't clear: I had included 'abstinence' while attempting to address technological availabilities during the stone-age. That was my mix-up, and you were right to pick up on it and disagree.
                            Kane's Eye View

                            Primal Kane

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              You are right. We do have a lot more technologies for it now. But I wouldn't discount herbal remedies when they were needed.
                              http://cattaillady.com/ My blog exploring the beginning stages of learning how to homestead. With the occasional rant.

                              Originally Posted by TheFastCat: Less is more more or less

                              And now I have an Etsy store: CattailsandCalendula

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Misabi View Post
                                And anal
                                Yeah, that's one way of avoiding pregnancy! Though, I have to say, I've never been interested in that, and currently have no desire to participate in anything like that.

                                Originally posted by Misabi View Post
                                Because apparently sodomy is less of a sin than using contraception, or is it just that they're less likely to get caught
                                Don't even get me started on the unfettered madness that is the Catholic church. Their doctrines about sexuality comprise some of the most contradictory, oppressive and, frankly, maniacal statements to have ever been penned. Elaine Pagels, however, has an excellent and thorough-going examination of the issues of sex and Christian politics in her book Adam, Eve, and the Serpent: Sex and Politics in Early Christianity.
                                Kane's Eye View

                                Primal Kane

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X