1 Jun

Deconstructing Vitamin D

sunBefore phototropic plants began bending toward sunlight, before jellyfish developed ocelli, the light-sensing organs that allow them to distinguish between up (sunlight) and down, before the bikini-clad beach denizens began tanning en masse, and before the first house cat followed the sliver of sunlight around the room all afternoon, our primitive, microscopic marine forebears were flourishing by converting the sun’s energy into chemical energy usable by biological life. You’re probably aware of photosynthesis, the process by which plants, algae, and other organisms do it and produce byproducts like oxygen, but even the unicellular archaea that do not produce oxygen utilize sunlight for energy. And if you aren’t obtaining energy directly from the sun, you’re probably eating the organisms that do. Either way, sunlight directly or indirectly supports all life (well, except for the chemoautotrophs living in deep sea hydrothermal vents feeding off of inorganic energy sources like iron, ammonia, or sulfur).

Humans don’t directly consume sunlight, though. We aren’t breatharians or walking, talking photosynthesizers. Sunlight might feel good and it might brighten up our moods, but we don’t consume it for metabolic sustenance. It does, however, provide the raw material for the 7- dehydrocholesterol in our skin to manufacture the ever-important vitamin D3, or cholecalciferol.

For some organisms, like the naked mole rat with its natural, “preferred” vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D is unimportant. But for most, including man, vitamin D is vital. You might even say it’s the most important vitamin of all. It’s not really even a vitamin, in fact; it’s a secesteroid, a hormonal precursor that closely resembles steroids like cortisol, testosterone, and cholesterol. Most vitamins are exogenous and stem from outside sources. Vitamin D is a different sort of “vitamin.” We mammals make it in-house.

Vitamin D is essential to us. As an equatorial people, we homo sapiens all spent well over half our collective development time bathed in tropical sun, almost year-round. Those of us who flitted off to the South Pacific and other equatorial regions got plenty of the stuff, too. Northerners even developed fair skin with less melanin, which maximized their ability to produce vitamin D from less sunlight. We’ve clearly evolved with the availability of sunlight – and therefore vitamin D3 – as a central stressor to our development.

As you know, the Primal Blueprint is about looking for that perfect storm of evolutionary concordance and modern scientific confirmation. I try to find the eye of the storm and stay there. When it moves, I move with it.

To evaluate whether a food or nutrient or behavior is suitable or not, I:

  1. Check out the anthropological records. I look at the historical legacy and ask some questions. Is there evolutionary precedent? Did our ancestors have regular, spotty, or zero access? Clearly, we did, having spent the bulk of our evolution on the equator with regular access to sunlight.
  2. Check out the current science and ask more questions. What does the epidemiology show? Are there any randomized controlled trials on the subject? Were they animal studies or human? There is quite a bit of data. Here’s a small taste, and I’ll address more of it tomorrow.

Vitamin D checks out on all levels. We’re not just talking about some exogenous substance which our ancestors may have occasionally come across and which may confer benefits, like bone marrow or polyphenols. This is vitamin D, the active form of which – called calcitriol – is produced in our livers in response to cholecalciferol derived from UV-B radiation. That’s sunlight, a resource readily available to our equatorial ancestors, the importance of which is indicated by the presence of naturally-occurring vitamin D receptors in the body’s cells.

Our bodies clearly consider it essential, but why? What does it do?

  • It regulates the levels of calcium and phosphate in the bloodstream, and it promotes the mineralization and growth of bones, working together with calcium, vitamin A, and vitamin K2. Severe deficiency can cause rickets.
  • It plays a massive role in the immune response, activating and “arming” the killer T-cells for defense against infections and bacteria.
  • It modulates the expression of genes that regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation, suggesting a potential role in cancer incidence. Epidemiology suggests links between vitamin D deficiency and most cancers, including breast, colorectal, and pretty much all the big ones.
  • It reduces systemic, chronic inflammation.

For something as readily available on any given sunny day, it’s also, surprisingly, in short supply these days. We’re told to avoid the sun at all costs or, if we absolutely must venture out into the light, to apply a layer of sunscreen so thick and physically impregnable that an equal amount of something as inert as lite mayo would be just as effective. Between office jobs without a view, window panes that allow UV-A but not UV-B rays, fleshy embarrassed physiques that never see the light, chubby kids who wear t-shirts to go swimming, and even widespread burqa usage in certain regions, humans just aren’t giving their skin enough opportunities to create vitamin D3. And if it’s an essentiality, it’s probably best to provide your body plenty of opportunities to make (or consume) it.

But what’s the best way? Sun? Supplements? Diet?

Tomorrow, I’ll discuss how to rectify this potentially massive problem.

Get Free Health Tips, Recipes and Workouts Delivered to Your Inbox

You want comments? We got comments:

Imagine you’re George Clooney. Take a moment to admire your grooming and wit. Okay, now imagine someone walks up to you and asks, “What’s your name?” You say, “I’m George Clooney.” Or maybe you say, “I’m the Clooninator!” You don’t say “I’m George of George Clooney Sells Movies Blog” and you certainly don’t say, “I’m Clooney Weight Loss Plan”. So while spam is technically meat, it ain’t anywhere near Primal. Please nickname yourself something your friends would call you.

  1. I tell everyone about d3, sadly not many listen to me. I got into a heated argument with my uncle last weekend. He told me there is no way I know more than a doctor about anything. I shut up after that.

    Aaron Curl wrote on June 2nd, 2010
  2. Yes, it’s hard to talk to anybody if you mention something that goes against the grain. (CW, mass brain washing)
    There are plenty of articles in the press now about slathering on the sun cream. Here in Ireland the sun is very shy, you might see it for a week or so and that’s it, but people prepare for their holidays abroad in Spain or Italy so the ‘good advice’ is timely.
    The rate of skin cancer has almost doubled in Ireland over the past 10 years. Why? It’s not because people don’t apply enough sunscreen or often enough, I think.
    “I wouldn’t leave the bedroom without factor 50 – summer and winter,” asserts Dr Rosemary Coleman, consultant dermatologist in a private clinic , admitting that her job removing skin cancers every day leaves her inclined to such a strict regime.
    “There is a misconception that you only pick up cancer on two-week holidays in the Canaries – but so many cancer patients have never left the country,” she points out. Hmmm. ‘pick up cancer’?!
    And she recommends taking vit D supps if you always use sun creams, like her, cover with a hat and clothes and stay away from the sun from 11 to 3.
    It doesn’t make sense from the point of view of evolution. Is there something wrong with the atmosphere? Peasants working in the sun all summer get very brown arms and faces but I never heard anybody talking about skin cancer.
    I hope Mark is going to talk about optimal sun exposure for people who avoid omega 6 and grains.

    lightcan wrote on June 2nd, 2010
  3. It’s crazy how we are so afraid of the sun. Just like everything else in life, as long as you don’t overdo it, there’s nothing to fear. It’s something that just cannot be replaced in pills.

    Alex Parker wrote on June 2nd, 2010
  4. Mark,
    No doubt Sunlight and Vitamin D is good for us, but this article concerned me a couple of days ago:
    http://www.westonaprice.org/component/content/article/55-wapf-blog/1941.html

    It basically states the optimum Vit D levels are 30-35 ng/ml, much less that the recommended figures (for example, vit d council recommends no less than 50 ng/ml). Even vit d levels above 80 ng/ml could increase cancer risk.

    I enrolled in a 5-year vit d. study at http://www.grassrootshealth.net/. At 3.000 IU/day, my vit d. levels were 33 ng/ml. I increased my dosage to 5.000 IU/day to get above 50 ng/ml, but now I am wondering if this is good for me.

    What do you think ?

    Luis wrote on June 2nd, 2010
  5. I have had skin cancer (6 years ago) and was told stay out of the sun and use a sun screen! I am so oily and by the end of the day people can fix their hair in the shine of my forehead. I think I am going to break from sunscreen and see what happens. I agree that baking a chemical in our skin just cannot be good!

    ChrisD wrote on June 2nd, 2010
  6. Great post, i think a lot of hype and hysteria needs to be debunked. I love the sun and will always try to catch some rays when its out but putting sun cream on to protect your skin is an absolute must! Skin cancer’s a serious danger but as long as your sensible i think even the palest of us can enjoy the sunshine

    ZacsPlymouthGym wrote on June 4th, 2010
  7. Hi, this is a great blog!

    yamaha spx wrote on February 13th, 2012

Leave a Reply

If you'd like to add an avatar to all of your comments click here!

© 2012 Mark's Daily Apple | Design By The Blog Studio