<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Pharma: Bad Science AND Bad Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/</link>
	<description>Serving up health and fitness insights (daily, of course) with a side of irreverence.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark&#8217;s Daily Apple &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-32015</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark&#8217;s Daily Apple &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-32015</guid>
		<description>[...] Big Pharma: Bad Science and Bad Business - Feb. 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Big Pharma: Bad Science and Bad Business - Feb. 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WEL</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-30653</link>
		<dc:creator>WEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-30653</guid>
		<description>MAXIDEX  WARNING
I had eye surgery and in the post-op pack was MAXIDEX( dexamethasone) drops by Alcon Labs, Ft. Worth, Rx.   Eight drops later and I was  BLIND   Other complications are optic nerve damage, corneal damage, glaucoma and secondary infection

BEWARE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAXIDEX  WARNING<br />
I had eye surgery and in the post-op pack was MAXIDEX( dexamethasone) drops by Alcon Labs, Ft. Worth, Rx.   Eight drops later and I was  BLIND   Other complications are optic nerve damage, corneal damage, glaucoma and secondary infection</p>
<p>BEWARE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark&#8217;s Daily Apple &#187; Blog Archive &#187; High Blood Pressure and Follow-up Care</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-27710</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark&#8217;s Daily Apple &#187; Blog Archive &#187; High Blood Pressure and Follow-up Care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-27710</guid>
		<description>[...] Big Pharma: Bad Science and Bad Business [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Big Pharma: Bad Science and Bad Business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasquatch</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-26835</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasquatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 22:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-26835</guid>
		<description>Hi Everyone, 

I would like to ask that people be respectful of others in this comments area.  You can make your point without being insulting.  When you make a point aggressively, it polarizes people instead of convincing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Everyone, </p>
<p>I would like to ask that people be respectful of others in this comments area.  You can make your point without being insulting.  When you make a point aggressively, it polarizes people instead of convincing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-26684</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 02:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-26684</guid>
		<description>Enjoy the blog and your thoughts on these issues as well.  I have to say though that I feel getting rid of the forum was a bad decision.  The only reason traffic there died was because you guys allowed internet bots to take over.  I run a forum of my own that I've had about 4 years now, same software that you used for yours, never had a spam problem.  Reason is because I nipped it in the bud from day one, and it doesn't take me sitting at the computer 24/7 either, sometimes I go a few days without logging in and there are never any problems.  You pretty much let the bots win and that's rather disappointing.  Keep up the good work with the blog though, if people don't like reading about your articles such as these they don't have to read them.  I think they add great value to your blog overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy the blog and your thoughts on these issues as well.  I have to say though that I feel getting rid of the forum was a bad decision.  The only reason traffic there died was because you guys allowed internet bots to take over.  I run a forum of my own that I&#8217;ve had about 4 years now, same software that you used for yours, never had a spam problem.  Reason is because I nipped it in the bud from day one, and it doesn&#8217;t take me sitting at the computer 24/7 either, sometimes I go a few days without logging in and there are never any problems.  You pretty much let the bots win and that&#8217;s rather disappointing.  Keep up the good work with the blog though, if people don&#8217;t like reading about your articles such as these they don&#8217;t have to read them.  I think they add great value to your blog overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sisson</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-26638</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/big-pharma-downfall/#comment-26638</guid>
		<description>Jerry,

This is the new forum. As we explained last week, the old one just wasn't getting much traffic and, since this comments section was where the action was taking place, we decided to focus our attention here.

Your point about the "alternative/natural" medicine people is spot on. I agree that my industry is also fraught with too many people scamming and telling half-truths. Unfortunately, it's also difficult to weed out the good from the bad here as well. When my friend Doug accepted ads from glyconutrients people, I told him I was not thrilled and that it would cut into his credibility. Doug depends on sponsor dollars to be able to air his show. It's tough to find good advertisers who want to support an alternative show. On balance, he offers good advice and certainly some "interesting points of view". I don't agree with some of what he says or his guests say, but his is still the best health talk show on television and it's one of the few areas I can educate the public on my own views. To his credit, he did eventually pull the ads on glyconutrients when he saw the evidence. He also pulled ads for "foot detox baths" after he reviewed the evidence. We are working together to try to find that balance between sponsor dollars and good credible products. It's not easy.

It's tough for me to find a platform to educate and legitimately sell my products. The FDA won't let me say much about their effectiveness, so I have to talk about how the body works and what nutrients support those functions. In the end, your understanding of how things work makes it easier for you and others to see how drugs might "interfere, block or circumvent" normal healing processes, but how some specific alternative methods might "support" normal and healthy structure and function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry,</p>
<p>This is the new forum. As we explained last week, the old one just wasn&#8217;t getting much traffic and, since this comments section was where the action was taking place, we decided to focus our attention here.</p>
<p>Your point about the &#8220;alternative/natural&#8221; medicine people is spot on. I agree that my industry is also fraught with too many people scamming and telling half-truths. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s also difficult to weed out the good from the bad here as well. When my friend Doug accepted ads from glyconutrients people, I told him I was not thrilled and that it would cut into his credibility. Doug depends on sponsor dollars to be able to air his show. It&#8217;s tough to find good advertisers who want to support an alternative show. On balance, he offers good advice and certainly some &#8220;interesting points of view&#8221;. I don&#8217;t agree with some of what he says or his guests say, but his is still the best health talk show on television and it&#8217;s one of the few areas I can educate the public on my own views. To his credit, he did eventually pull the ads on glyconutrients when he saw the evidence. He also pulled ads for &#8220;foot detox baths&#8221; after he reviewed the evidence. We are working together to try to find that balance between sponsor dollars and good credible products. It&#8217;s not easy.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s tough for me to find a platform to educate and legitimately sell my products. The FDA won&#8217;t let me say much about their effectiveness, so I have to talk about how the body works and what nutrients support those functions. In the end, your understanding of how things work makes it easier for you and others to see how drugs might &#8220;interfere, block or circumvent&#8221; normal healing processes, but how some specific alternative methods might &#8220;support&#8221; normal and healthy structure and function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
