Meet Mark

Let me introduce myself. My name is Mark Sisson. I’m 63 years young. I live and work in Malibu, California. In a past life I was a professional marathoner and triathlete. Now my life goal is to help 100 million people get healthy. I started this blog in 2006 to empower people to take full responsibility for their own health and enjoyment of life by investigating, discussing, and critically rethinking everything we’ve assumed to be true about health and wellness...

Tell Me More
Stay Connected
November 01, 2007

Is Banked Blood Bad?

By Mark Sisson
5 Comments

Blood transfusions save millions of lives every year, and I happen to think giving blood is one of the simplest and best acts of love for your fellow humans. But banked blood may also be causing unintended harm.

In an interesting piece I caught in this week’s Time, writer Alice Park details a difficult question health experts have been pondering for some time now: whether banked blood is causing deaths in some patients. Heart attacks and deaths jump significantly – as much as 25% – in patients who receive blood transfusions. It’s not due to allergies or infections or mistakes. Even accounting for these factors, heart attacks still happen more often and without warning in those who get transfusions. What gives?

As it turns out, nitric oxide deficiency is common in stored blood. Nitric oxide (NO) assists red blood cells in transporting oxygen to various tissues, as well as supporting vessels. Technically a gas, NO is vital to proper blood function, and banked blood has been found to show depleted levels as high as 70%. In other words, patients are getting blood that can’t deliver the goods. In light of this, doctors are increasingly waiting until patients’ hematocrit levels are lowered – as low as 30%, a change in practice from the previous standard of 45-55%. That helps. Another solution – and a more controversial one – is to inject patients with liquid NO to mitigate the risk of a blood transfusion.

Another interesting note in medical history, I think, and I wanted to share it with you.

Size 8 Jeans Flickr Photo (CC)

Further reading:

My thoughts on health care in America

Is Intermittent Fasting healthy?

The homeopathy scam

Subscribe to Mark’s Daily Apple feeds

Subscribe to the Newsletter

If you'd like to add an avatar to all of your comments click here!

Leave a Reply

5 Comments on "Is Banked Blood Bad?"

avatar

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Magnus
8 years 10 months ago

Although, banked blood may be deficient with nitric oxide, the body can compensate.

Dave C.
8 years 10 months ago

Although I agree that giving blood is a great idea, I’m not allowed to participate. I’m on the banned list at blood banks because I lived in Berlin for three years in the late 80s during a mad cow episode in Europe.

Moe
Moe
8 years 10 months ago

This is an old and well-known fact among doctors. Most prefer not to transfuse blood unless it is a must.

Dave C.
8 years 10 months ago

>>Most prefer not to transfuse blood unless it is a must.

Dave C.
8 years 10 months ago

Hmmmm…my comment didn’t seem to make it. I’ll try again.

I would think that in most (all) instances, by the time a transfusion is warranted, it’s a must (blood doping cyclists aside). What would be an example of geeting blood when it’s not a must? (not a flame–just looking for info).

wpDiscuz