<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Visual Guide to Antioxidants (Fridge-Friendly!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/</link>
	<description>Serving up health and fitness insights (daily, of course) with a side of irreverence.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark&#8217;s Daily Apple &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Healthy Tastes Great!</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-19094</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark&#8217;s Daily Apple &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Healthy Tastes Great!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-19094</guid>
		<description>[...] A Visual Guide to Antioxidants [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Visual Guide to Antioxidants [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-17869</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-17869</guid>
		<description>Mark and team:

I'm curious about glutathione . . . I read Art de Vany's blog and he talks about taking a glutathione supplement along with your Damage Control.  I'm using DC now.  Any plans to include glutathione in it?  Or should I add on an additional glutathione supplement?  

Thanks

Drew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark and team:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious about glutathione . . . I read Art de Vany&#8217;s blog and he talks about taking a glutathione supplement along with your Damage Control.  I&#8217;m using DC now.  Any plans to include glutathione in it?  Or should I add on an additional glutathione supplement?  </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Drew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sisson</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-8846</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-8846</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Chris,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wow. Good stuff. Sometimes we are so close to this we forget how confusing it can be. CoQ10 is a "co-enzyme". It is vital to human functioning. In fact, it probably should have been given "vitamin" status when they were naming all the vitamins. Many vitamins (and CoQ10)are considered co-enzymes in that they are involved in the operations or manufacturing of actual enzymes (but they are NOT enzymes themselves). Co-enzymes are co-factors upon which some of the larger, more complex enzymes depend to accomplish their tasks. Those larger enzymes are the ones I suggest you can't consume in food and hope that they will have an affect on your health, because the acid in your stomach will break them down before they reach the bloodstream.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Wow. Good stuff. Sometimes we are so close to this we forget how confusing it can be. CoQ10 is a &#8220;co-enzyme&#8221;. It is vital to human functioning. In fact, it probably should have been given &#8220;vitamin&#8221; status when they were naming all the vitamins. Many vitamins (and CoQ10)are considered co-enzymes in that they are involved in the operations or manufacturing of actual enzymes (but they are NOT enzymes themselves). Co-enzymes are co-factors upon which some of the larger, more complex enzymes depend to accomplish their tasks. Those larger enzymes are the ones I suggest you can&#8217;t consume in food and hope that they will have an affect on your health, because the acid in your stomach will break them down before they reach the bloodstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-8819</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-8819</guid>
		<description>From Mark's excellent argument against raw foodism:
"Fact: You cannot be deficient in enzymes (unless you have a rare genetic condition). You don’t need enzymes from food. Your body has its own digestive enzymes or builds specific enzymes within cells to catalyze biochemical reactions. No amount of living or dead food is going to change that. Don’t fall for enzyme therapy, “curative” enzyme supplements (unless they are digestive enzymes), and diets that focus on enzymes. Some of those juicer infomercials focus on “enzyme benefits” and they drive me nuts (I’ve ranted about this, of course)."

I'm confused here.  It seems that Mark is arguing that enzymes don't have a nutritive benefit.  To me, the enzymes they speak of in juicer infomercials would be antioxidant enzymes - ones derived from juicing vegetables. Without getting into why you shouldn't juice and rather just eat the vegetable, and following the rest of his argument, shouldn't the exception he makes for enzyme supplements be for antioxidant enzymes rather than digestve ones?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Mark&#8217;s excellent argument against raw foodism:<br />
&#8220;Fact: You cannot be deficient in enzymes (unless you have a rare genetic condition). You don’t need enzymes from food. Your body has its own digestive enzymes or builds specific enzymes within cells to catalyze biochemical reactions. No amount of living or dead food is going to change that. Don’t fall for enzyme therapy, “curative” enzyme supplements (unless they are digestive enzymes), and diets that focus on enzymes. Some of those juicer infomercials focus on “enzyme benefits” and they drive me nuts (I’ve ranted about this, of course).&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m confused here.  It seems that Mark is arguing that enzymes don&#8217;t have a nutritive benefit.  To me, the enzymes they speak of in juicer infomercials would be antioxidant enzymes - ones derived from juicing vegetables. Without getting into why you shouldn&#8217;t juice and rather just eat the vegetable, and following the rest of his argument, shouldn&#8217;t the exception he makes for enzyme supplements be for antioxidant enzymes rather than digestve ones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-8816</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-8816</guid>
		<description>That is interesting, Chris, and thanks for the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is interesting, Chris, and thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-8788</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/a-visual-guide-to-antioxidants-fridge-friendly/#comment-8788</guid>
		<description>Interesting article here 

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-03/osu-sfn030507.php

about a study that showed flavonoids are not directly antioxidant, but are still beneficial through a different mecahnism:

"If you measure the activity of flavonoids in a test tube, they are indeed strong antioxidants," Frei said. "Based on laboratory tests of their ability to scavenge free radicals, it appears they have 3-5 times more antioxidant capacity than vitamins C or E. But with flavonoids in particular, what goes on in a test tube is not what’s happening in the human body."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article here </p>
<p><a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-03/osu-sfn030507.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-03/osu-sfn030507.php</a></p>
<p>about a study that showed flavonoids are not directly antioxidant, but are still beneficial through a different mecahnism:</p>
<p>&#8220;If you measure the activity of flavonoids in a test tube, they are indeed strong antioxidants,&#8221; Frei said. &#8220;Based on laboratory tests of their ability to scavenge free radicals, it appears they have 3-5 times more antioxidant capacity than vitamins C or E. But with flavonoids in particular, what goes on in a test tube is not what’s happening in the human body.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
